AS45090 Tencent Cloud 🇨🇳 CN

Shenzhen Tencent Computer Systems Company Limited. Announcing 2,301 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes

2,254

12,315,136 (48,106 × /24)

IPv6 prefixes

2.2 × /32

Upstreams

transit providers observed

Peers

settlement-free adjacencies

Downstreams

transit customers observed

Customer cone

ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number: AS45090
Name: Tencent Cloud
Organisation: Tencent-CN
Country: 🇨🇳 CN
RIR: APNIC
Allocated: 2008-02-01
Network type: Content
Traffic levels: 1-5Tbps
Scope: Asia Pacific
Peering policy: Open
Website: http://www.tencent.com
PeeringDB: net/14457
Exchanges: 6

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

2,291 valid (99.6%) 8 invalid (0.3%) 2 no ROA (0.1%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network	Country	Cone	IPv4 prefixes	Paths	Source
AS4837 China Unicom Backbone	🇨🇳 CN	28,900	1,522	433	CAIDA
AS9808 China Mobile Backbone	🇨🇳 CN	255	14,203	28	CAIDA
AS4808 China Unicom Beijing Province Network	🇨🇳 CN	86	1,536	242	CAIDA
AS24400 Shanghai Mobile Communications Co.,Ltd.	🇨🇳 CN	39	545	14	CAIDA
AS23724 China Telecom Beijing IDC Network	🇨🇳 CN	16	877	9,003	CAIDA
AS4811 China Telecom Shanghai IDC Network	🇨🇳 CN	13	1,519	32,940	CAIDA
AS38283 CHINANET SiChuan Telecom Internet Data Center	🇨🇳 CN	10	524	5,057	CAIDA
AS136958 China Unicom Guangdong IDC Network	🇨🇳 CN	10	458	815	CAIDA
AS58466 CHINANET Guangdong province network	🇨🇳 CN	9	204	33,407	CAIDA
AS58542 China Telecom Tianjin Province IDC Network	🇨🇳 CN	4	68	3,802	CAIDA
AS134756 CHINANET Nanjing Jishan IDC network	🇨🇳 CN	3	200	1,811	CAIDA
AS131574 Beijing Haiyu Technology Co. Ltd..	🇨🇳 CN	3	4	158	CAIDA
AS134420 Chongqing Telecom	🇨🇳 CN	2	185	2,218	CAIDA
AS140979 China Unicom Shanghai FuTe IDC network	🇨🇳 CN	2	189	738	CAIDA
AS133111 CERNET New Technology Co., Ltd	🇨🇳 CN	0	8	637	inferred
AS134169 CERNEWTECH (Beijing) co.,LTD	🇨🇳 CN	0	2	147	inferred

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

No peers observed at the collectors.

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

No downstreams observed at the collectors.

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.