AS45090 Tencent Cloud 🇨🇳 CN

Shenzhen Tencent Computer Systems Company Limited. Announcing 2,297 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes

2,250

12,302,336 (48,056 × /24)

IPv6 prefixes

2.2 × /32

Upstreams

transit providers observed

Peers

settlement-free adjacencies

Downstreams

transit customers observed

Customer cone

ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number: AS45090
Name: Tencent Cloud
Organisation: Tencent-CN
Country: 🇨🇳 CN
RIR: APNIC
Allocated: 2008-02-01
Network type: Content
Traffic levels: 1-5Tbps
Scope: Asia Pacific
Peering policy: Open
Website: http://www.tencent.com
PeeringDB: net/14457
Exchanges: 6

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

2,289 valid (99.7%) 6 invalid (0.3%) 2 no ROA (0.1%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network	Country	Cone	IPv4 prefixes	Paths	Source
AS4837 China Unicom Backbone	🇨🇳 CN	23,139	1,522	1	CAIDA
AS9808 China Mobile Backbone	🇨🇳 CN	263	14,256	56	CAIDA
AS24400 Shanghai Mobile Communications Co.,Ltd.	🇨🇳 CN	37	539	57	CAIDA
AS38283 CHINANET SiChuan Telecom Internet Data Center	🇨🇳 CN	17	524	5,320	CAIDA
AS23724 China Telecom Beijing IDC Network	🇨🇳 CN	16	846	9,441	CAIDA
AS4811 China Telecom Shanghai IDC Network	🇨🇳 CN	13	1,515	33,794	CAIDA
AS58466 CHINANET Guangdong province network	🇨🇳 CN	9	194	34,214	CAIDA
AS56041 China Mobile Group Zhejiang Company	🇨🇳 CN	7	2,207	2	CAIDA
AS58542 China Telecom Tianjin Province IDC Network	🇨🇳 CN	4	66	3,899	CAIDA
AS134756 CHINANET Nanjing Jishan IDC network	🇨🇳 CN	3	200	1,860	CAIDA
AS131574 Beijing Haiyu Technology Co. Ltd..	🇨🇳 CN	3	4	160	CAIDA
AS4816 China Telecom (Group)	🇨🇳 CN	3	46	82	CAIDA
AS134420 Chongqing Telecom	🇨🇳 CN	2	185	2,332	CAIDA
AS133111 CERNET New Technology Co., Ltd	🇨🇳 CN	0	8	549	inferred
AS134169 CERNEWTECH (Beijing) co.,LTD	🇨🇳 CN	0	1	133	inferred

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

No peers observed at the collectors.

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

No downstreams observed at the collectors.

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.