AS45295 PT Cipta Informatika Cemerlang 🇮🇩 ID
PT. Cipta Informatika Cemerlang. Announcing 17 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
16
4,096 (16 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
1
1 × /32
Upstreams
5
transit providers observed
Peers
5
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
0
transit customers observed
Customer cone
0
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS45295
- Name
- PT Cipta Informatika Cemerlang
- Organisation
- Cipta Informatika Cemerlang
- Country
- 🇮🇩 ID
- RIR
- APNIC
- Allocated
- 2008-07-28
- Network type
- Cable/DSL/ISP
- Traffic levels
- 10-20Gbps
- Scope
- Asia Pacific
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
- AS45295:AS-KEPRINET
- Website
- http://www.cic.net.id
- PeeringDB
- net/29818
- Exchanges
- 2
- Facilities
- 4
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS7713 PT Telkom Indonesia Tbk | 🇮🇩 ID | 43,066 | 3,581 | 124 | CAIDA |
| AS4800 PT Aplikanusa Lintasarta | 🇮🇩 ID | 5,829 | 719 | 216 | CAIDA |
| AS136106 PT Mega Akses Persada | 🇮🇩 ID | 2,528 | 17 | 231 | CAIDA |
| AS23947 PT Mora Telematika Indonesia Tbk | 🇮🇩 ID | 2,261 | 12 | 87 | CAIDA |
| AS153068 Nusantara Global Exchange | 🇮🇩 ID | 28 | 2 | 31 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS8966 Etisalat (E&) | 🇦🇪 AE | 43,002 | 49 | 3 | CAIDA |
| AS24482 SG.GS | 🇸🇬 SG | 4,726 | 45 | 12 | CAIDA |
| AS17639 Converge ICT Solutions Inc. | 🇵🇠PH | 274 | 567 | 8 | CAIDA |
| AS38001 NewMedia Express Pte. Ltd. | 🇸🇬 SG | 27 | 68 | 3 | CAIDA |
| AS131111 PT Mora Telematika Indonesia Tbk | 🇮🇩 ID | 6 | 430 | 17 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
No downstreams observed at the collectors.
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.