AS4609 Companhia de Telecomunicacoes de Macau SARL π²π΄ MO
Companhia de Telecomunicacoes de Macau. Announcing 89 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
83
748,288 (2,923 Γ /24)
IPv6 prefixes
6
1.1 Γ /32
Upstreams
3
transit providers observed
Peers
0
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
6
transit customers observed
Customer cone
29
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS4609
- Name
- Companhia de Telecomunicacoes de Macau SARL
- Organisation
- Macau CTM
- Country
- π²π΄ MO
- RIR
- APNIC
- Allocated
- 1995-06-15
- Network type
- Cable/DSL/ISP
- Traffic levels
- 300-500Gbps
- Scope
- Asia Pacific
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
- AS-CTM
- Website
- https://www.ctm.net/
- PeeringDB
- net/7707
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS58453 China Mobile International | ππ° HK | 23,129 | 76 | 79 | CAIDA |
| AS24429 Alibaba Cloud | π¨π³ CN | 160 | 648 | 236 | CAIDA |
| AS7617 CTM (HK) Limited | ππ° HK | 33 | 0 | 4,274 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS13335 Cloudflare, Inc. | πΊπΈ US | 19,805 | 2,399 | 76 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS4058 CITIC Telecom International CPC Limited | ππ° HK | 16 | 206 | 6 | CAIDA |
| AS139341 WeChat/QQ CDN | πΈπ¬ SG | 10 | 1,055 | 152 | CAIDA |
| AS138164 Macau University of Science and Technology | π²π΄ MO | 0 | 2 | 152 | CAIDA |
| AS7582 University of Macau | π²π΄ MO | 0 | 2 | 118 | CAIDA |
| AS136167 CHINA TELECOM (MACAU) COMPANY LIMITED | π²π΄ MO | 0 | 14 | 68 | inferred |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.