AS4658 2012 Limited / Netfront 🇭🇰 HK
2012 Limited. Announcing 33 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
25
13,312 (52 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
8
1 × /32
Upstreams
4
transit providers observed
Peers
5
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
1
transit customers observed
Customer cone
2
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS4658
- Name
- 2012 Limited / Netfront
- Organisation
- 2012 Limited
- Country
- 🇭🇰 HK
- RIR
- APNIC
- Allocated
- 1995-12-24
- Network type
- Cable/DSL/ISP
- Traffic levels
- 10-20Gbps
- Scope
- Asia Pacific
- Peering policy
- Selective
- IRR as-set
- AS-NETFRONT-2
- Website
- https://www.netfront.net/
- Looking glass
- https://lookingglass.netfront.net/
- PeeringDB
- net/18084
- Exchanges
- 1
- Facilities
- 3
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 53,561 | 235 | 713 | CAIDA |
| AS9304 HGC Global Communications Limited | 🇭🇰 HK | 6,024 | 1,974 | 164 | CAIDA |
| AS24077 TMHK Global Transit | 🇭🇰 HK | 3 | 4 | 32 | CAIDA |
| AS4635 HKIX Route Servers | 🇭🇰 HK | 0 | 0 | 76 | inferred |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS8966 Etisalat (E&) | 🇦🇪 AE | 43,217 | 49 | 1 | CAIDA |
| AS9930 TIME dotCom Bhd | 🇲🇾 MY | 21,340 | 75 | 12 | CAIDA |
| AS8359 MTS PJSC | 🇷🇺 RU | 5,720 | 446 | 12 | CAIDA |
| AS24482 SG.GS | 🇸🇬 SG | 4,776 | 45 | 33 | CAIDA |
| AS55720 Gigabit Hosting Sdn Bhd | 🇲🇾 MY | 139 | 278 | 6 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS140881 HGC Global Communications Limited | 🇭🇰 HK | 0 | 2 | 69 | CAIDA |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.