AS48078 Dagomys Telecom LLC 🇷🇺 RU
Announcing 19 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
18
6,912 (27 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
1
1 × /32
Upstreams
3
transit providers observed
Peers
10
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
1
transit customers observed
Customer cone
0
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS48078
- Name
- Dagomys Telecom LLC
- Organisation
- Dagomys Telecom
- Country
- 🇷🇺 RU
- RIR
- RIPENCC
- Allocated
- 2008-10-09
- Scope
- Not Disclosed
- Peering policy
- Open
- PeeringDB
- net/28666
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS12389 Rostelecom PJSC | 🇷🇺 RU | 25,238 | 3,269 | 572 | CAIDA |
| AS8359 MTS PJSC | 🇷🇺 RU | 20,018 | 455 | 43 | CAIDA |
| AS31500 Global Network Management Inc | 🇦🇬 AG | 19,554 | 40 | 135 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 54,932 | 237 | 18 | CAIDA |
| AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions | 🇧🇫 BF | 24,569 | 64 | 17 | CAIDA |
| AS24482 SG.GS | 🇸🇬 SG | 19,413 | 45 | 19 | CAIDA |
| AS50673 Serverius Holding B.V. | 🇳🇱 NL | 19,328 | 130 | 19 | CAIDA |
| AS50629 LWLcom GmbH | 🇩🇪 DE | 18,913 | 24 | 16 | CAIDA |
| AS56655 Gigahost AS | 🇳🇴 NO | 18,757 | 57 | 2 | CAIDA |
| AS208972 GIBIRNet Iletisim | 🇹🇷 TR | 702 | 90 | 18 | CAIDA |
| AS8218 Zayo Europe | 🇫🇷 FR | 430 | 19 | 1 | CAIDA |
| AS25091 IP-Max SA | 🇨🇭 CH | 195 | 25 | 1 | CAIDA |
| AS49673 Truenetwork LLC | 🇷🇺 RU | 9 | 4 | 17 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS57629 LLC IVI.RU | 🇷🇺 RU | 0 | 9 | 33 | inferred |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.