AS48084 Uzhnie Magistraljnie Linii Svyazi LLC 🇷🇺 RU
Announcing 2 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
1
256 (1 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
1
8 × /32
Upstreams
6
transit providers observed
Peers
7
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
21
transit customers observed
Customer cone
91
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS48084
- Name
- Uzhnie Magistraljnie Linii Svyazi LLC
- Organisation
- UMLC
- Country
- 🇷🇺 RU
- RIR
- RIPENCC
- Allocated
- 2008-10-10
- Network type
- NSP
- Traffic levels
- 500-1000Gbps
- Scope
- Regional
- Peering policy
- Open
- Website
- http://www.umlc.ru
- PeeringDB
- net/14618
- Exchanges
- 2
- Facilities
- 2
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS12389 Rostelecom PJSC | 🇷🇺 RU | 26,757 | 3,255 | 44 | CAIDA |
| AS57304 RETN Russia | 🇷🇺 RU | 25,244 | 6 | 904 | CAIDA |
| AS3216 Vimpelcom PJSC | 🇷🇺 RU | 24,904 | 590 | 979 | CAIDA |
| AS31133 MegaFon PJSC | 🇷🇺 RU | 24,686 | 493 | 1,104 | CAIDA |
| AS31500 Global Network Management Inc | 🇦🇬 AG | 21,353 | 40 | 36 | CAIDA |
| AS28917 Fiord Networks, UAB | 🇱🇹 LT | 20,952 | 6 | 754 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 54,012 | 185 | 55 | CAIDA |
| AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions | 🇧🇫 BF | 23,669 | 64 | 52 | CAIDA |
| AS8447 A1 Telekom Austria AG | 🇦🇹 AT | 20,563 | 121 | 1 | CAIDA |
| AS56655 Gigahost AS | 🇳🇴 NO | 15,424 | 35 | 7 | CAIDA |
| AS24482 SG.GS | 🇸🇬 SG | 4,708 | 45 | 64 | CAIDA |
| AS208972 GIBIRNet Iletisim | 🇹🇷 TR | 426 | 89 | 13 | CAIDA |
| AS6789 CRELCOM LLC | 🇷🇺 RU | 68 | 68 | 53 | CAIDA |
| AS49673 Truenetwork LLC | 🇷🇺 RU | 9 | 4 | 62 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.