AS48422 IT-STARCOM LLC 🇺🇦 UA
Announcing 17 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
16
4,096 (16 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
1
1 × /48
Upstreams
6
transit providers observed
Peers
6
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
19
transit customers observed
Customer cone
30
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS48422
- Name
- IT-STARCOM LLC
- Organisation
- IT-STARCOM
- Country
- 🇺🇦 UA
- RIR
- RIPENCC
- Allocated
- 2018-04-06
- Network type
- NSP
- Traffic levels
- 50-100Gbps
- Scope
- Regional
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
- AS-IT-STARCOM
- Website
- http://itstarcom.net
- PeeringDB
- net/21140
- Exchanges
- 6
- Facilities
- 2
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS174 Cogent Communications, LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 65,564 | 3,985 | 385 | CAIDA |
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 52,987 | 235 | 2,646 | CAIDA |
| AS9002 RETN Limited | 🇬🇧 GB | 50,720 | 18 | 108 | CAIDA |
| AS6663 Türk Telekom International | 🇷🇴 RO | 25,037 | 48 | 33 | inferred |
| AS28917 Fiord Networks, UAB | 🇱🇹 LT | 21,139 | 6 | 70 | CAIDA |
| AS6204 TMRC GROUP SRL | 🇷🇴 RO | 20,964 | 5 | 1 | inferred |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS20764 CJSC RASCOM | 🇷🇺 RU | 23,510 | 8 | 1 | CAIDA |
| AS3303 Swisscom (Schweiz) AG | 🇨🇭 CH | 20,758 | 345 | 1 | CAIDA |
| AS56655 Gigahost AS | 🇳🇴 NO | 15,750 | 32 | 1 | CAIDA |
| AS24482 SG.GS | 🇸🇬 SG | 5,000 | 45 | 43 | CAIDA |
| AS3326 Datagroup PJSC | 🇺🇦 UA | 489 | 85 | 1 | CAIDA |
| AS12859 BIT BV | 🇳🇱 NL | 38 | 67 | 4 | CAIDA |
| AS50304 Blix Solutions AS | 🇳🇴 NO | 34 | 103 | 68 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.