AS48695 Etihad GO Company For communications πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¦ SA

Announcing 804 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
381
101,888 (398 Γ— /24)
IPv6 prefixes
423
2,463 Γ— /48
Upstreams
1
transit providers observed
Peers
0
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
10
transit customers observed
Customer cone
19
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS48695
Name
Etihad GO Company For communications
Organisation
Etihad Atheeb Telecom /GO Telecom
Country
πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¦ SA
RIR
RIPENCC
Allocated
2009-01-06
Network type
NSP
Traffic levels
100-200Gbps
Scope
Global
Peering policy
Open
IRR as-set
RIPE::AS-ATHEEB-PEERS
PeeringDB
net/15966

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

804 valid (100.0%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 0 no ROA (0.0%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS47794 Etihad GO Company For communications πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¦ SA 35 186 30,215 CAIDA

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

No peers observed at the collectors.

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS25233 ARABIAN INTERNET & COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES CO.LTD πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¦ SA 10 52 32 CAIDA
AS44577 Saudi Energy Company πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¦ SA 0 6 270 CAIDA
AS48840 Perfect Presentation For Commercial Services Company, A Saudi Joint Stock Company πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¦ SA 0 5 158 CAIDA
AS43378 Ministry of Commerce and Industry in Saudi Arabia πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¦ SA 0 3 94 CAIDA
AS205695 Maximum Solutions for Communications and Information Technology LLC πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¦ SA 0 2 94 CAIDA
AS31699 BANK AL JAZIRA πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¦ SA 0 11 88 CAIDA
AS62415 Agricultural Development Fund (gov) πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¦ SA 0 2 77 CAIDA
AS60161 Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¦ SA 0 4 68 CAIDA
AS215557 Saudi Information Technology Company CJSC πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¦ SA 0 1 47 CAIDA
AS212436 Flynas Company PJS πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¦ SA 0 1 5 CAIDA

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.