AS48972 BetterBe B.V. πŸ‡³πŸ‡± NL

Announcing 5 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
3
4,096 (16 Γ— /24)
IPv6 prefixes
2
2 Γ— /32
Upstreams
6
transit providers observed
Peers
8
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
1
transit customers observed
Customer cone
2
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS48972
Name
BetterBe B.V.
Organisation
BetterBe
Country
πŸ‡³πŸ‡± NL
RIR
RIPENCC
Allocated
2009-03-16
Network type
Content
Traffic levels
100-1000Mbps
Scope
Regional
Peering policy
Open
IRR as-set
RIPE::AS-BETTERBE
Looking glass
https://lg.as48972.net/
PeeringDB
net/5421
Exchanges
2
Facilities
2

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

5 valid (100.0%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 0 no ROA (0.0%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS50673 Serverius Holding B.V. πŸ‡³πŸ‡± NL 16,224 130 1 inferred
AS20562 Open Peering (Broadband Hosting B.V.) πŸ‡³πŸ‡± NL 9,648 0 65 CAIDA
AS24785 Joint Transit (Broadband Hosting B.V.) πŸ‡³πŸ‡± NL 1,143 21 38 CAIDA
AS17639 Converge ICT Solutions Inc. πŸ‡΅πŸ‡­ PH 274 567 4 inferred
AS29632 Netassist International EOOD πŸ‡§πŸ‡¬ BG 45 0 6 inferred
AS20847 Previder B.V. πŸ‡³πŸ‡± NL 14 14 70 CAIDA

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 53,062 235 46 CAIDA
AS20485 TransTeleCom JSC πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί RU 28,382 85 4 CAIDA
AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions πŸ‡§πŸ‡« BF 21,814 64 8 CAIDA
AS24482 SG.GS πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬ SG 5,024 45 7 CAIDA
AS6696 VERIXI SA πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺ BE 144 49 4 CAIDA
AS48185 team.blue NV πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺ BE 14 1 5 CAIDA
AS204092 Association GRIFON πŸ‡«πŸ‡· FR 10 2 7 CAIDA
AS3333 Reseaux IP Europeens Network Coordination Centre (RIPE NCC) πŸ‡³πŸ‡± NL 0 7 7 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS200934 Defzone B.V. πŸ‡³πŸ‡± NL 0 1 76 CAIDA

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.