AS4927 Aseva LLC 🇺🇸 US
Announcing 12 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
10
58,880 (230 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
2
1.1 × /32
Upstreams
4
transit providers observed
Peers
3
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
5
transit customers observed
Customer cone
5
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS4927
- Name
- Aseva LLC
- Organisation
- Aseva LLC
- Country
- 🇺🇸 US
- RIR
- ARIN
- Allocated
- 1995-05-08
- Network type
- Cable/DSL/ISP
- Traffic levels
- 5-10Gbps
- Scope
- Regional
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
- AS-IMPU
- Website
- https://www.aseva.com/
- PeeringDB
- net/1962
- Exchanges
- 3
- Facilities
- 2
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS3356 Lumen (Level 3) | 🇺🇸 US | 71,465 | 2,088 | 160 | CAIDA |
| AS174 Cogent Communications, LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 66,174 | 3,955 | 67 | CAIDA |
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 54,403 | 185 | 867 | CAIDA |
| AS13335 Cloudflare, Inc. | 🇺🇸 US | 19,950 | 2,400 | 47 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS24482 SG.GS | 🇸🇬 SG | 4,874 | 45 | 27 | CAIDA |
| AS7575 Australian Academic and Research Network (AARNet) | 🇦🇺 AU | 569 | 201 | 1 | CAIDA |
| AS17639 Converge ICT Solutions Inc. | 🇵🇭 PH | 272 | 567 | 21 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS10596 Beckman Software Engineering | 🇺🇸 US | 0 | 9 | 461 | CAIDA |
| AS26402 City of Santa Barbara | 🇺🇸 US | 0 | 2 | 81 | CAIDA |
| AS30412 CITY OF CORONA | 🇺🇸 US | 0 | 1 | 47 | CAIDA |
| AS12210 Community West Bank, N.A. | 🇺🇸 US | 0 | 1 | 47 | CAIDA |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.