AS49375 No One Internet Ltd 🇬🇧 GB
Announcing 19 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
18
5,120 (20 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
1
8 × /32
Upstreams
2
transit providers observed
Peers
12
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
0
transit customers observed
Customer cone
0
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS49375
- Name
- No One Internet Ltd
- Organisation
- No One Internet
- Country
- 🇬🇧 GB
- RIR
- RIPENCC
- Allocated
- 2009-05-28
- Network type
- Cable/DSL/ISP
- Traffic levels
- 10-20Gbps
- Scope
- Global
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
- AS-NOONEINTERNET
- Website
- http://www.noone.co.uk
- PeeringDB
- net/2764
- Exchanges
- 2
- Facilities
- 1
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS1299 Arelion (fka. Telia Carrier) | 🇸🇪 SE | 68,700 | 132 | 217 | CAIDA |
| AS51945 ENLINK LTD | 🇬🇧 GB | 13 | 5 | 163 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 52,796 | 235 | 141 | CAIDA |
| AS3216 Vimpelcom PJSC | 🇷🇺 RU | 24,356 | 590 | 18 | CAIDA |
| AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions | 🇧🇫 BF | 21,462 | 64 | 18 | CAIDA |
| AS34549 meerfarbig GmbH & Co. KG | 🇩🇪 DE | 15,315 | 48 | 72 | CAIDA |
| AS24482 SG.GS | 🇸🇬 SG | 4,641 | 45 | 18 | CAIDA |
| AS17639 Converge ICT Solutions Inc. | 🇵🇠PH | 274 | 567 | 18 | CAIDA |
| AS12779 IT.Gate S.p.A. | 🇮🇹 IT | 76 | 25 | 18 | CAIDA |
| AS29169 GANDI SAS | 🇫🇷 FR | 47 | 8 | 18 | CAIDA |
| AS50304 Blix Solutions AS | 🇳🇴 NO | 34 | 103 | 38 | CAIDA |
| AS48362 Stadtwerke Feldkirch | 🇦🇹 AT | 15 | 8 | 18 | CAIDA |
| AS48185 team.blue NV | 🇧🇪 BE | 14 | 1 | 18 | CAIDA |
| AS50300 CustodianDC Limited | 🇬🇧 GB | 9 | 39 | 18 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
No downstreams observed at the collectors.
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.