AS49490 Circlenet LLP 🇬🇧 GB
Announcing 3 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
2
768 (3 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
1
1 × /32
Upstreams
4
transit providers observed
Peers
9
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
0
transit customers observed
Customer cone
0
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS49490
- Name
- Circlenet LLP
- Organisation
- Circlenet LLP
- Country
- 🇬🇧 GB
- RIR
- RIPENCC
- Allocated
- 2022-02-16
- Network type
- Cable/DSL/ISP
- Scope
- Europe
- Peering policy
- Open
- Website
- https://circle.cloud
- PeeringDB
- net/29315
- Exchanges
- 3
- Facilities
- 3
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS174 Cogent Communications, LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 65,588 | 3,985 | 15 | CAIDA |
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 52,981 | 235 | 78 | CAIDA |
| AS9002 RETN Limited | 🇬🇧 GB | 50,721 | 18 | 9 | CAIDA |
| AS213241 TECHIT.BE SRL | 🇧🇪 BE | 0 | 14 | 1 | inferred |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions | 🇧🇫 BF | 21,762 | 64 | 2 | CAIDA |
| AS34549 meerfarbig GmbH & Co. KG | 🇩🇪 DE | 15,719 | 48 | 9 | CAIDA |
| AS24482 SG.GS | 🇸🇬 SG | 5,033 | 45 | 3 | CAIDA |
| AS17639 Converge ICT Solutions Inc. | 🇵🇭 PH | 271 | 567 | 2 | CAIDA |
| AS25091 IP-Max SA | 🇨🇭 CH | 171 | 25 | 1 | CAIDA |
| AS50304 Blix Solutions AS | 🇳🇴 NO | 34 | 103 | 2 | CAIDA |
| AS48362 Stadtwerke Feldkirch | 🇦🇹 AT | 16 | 8 | 3 | CAIDA |
| AS48185 team.blue NV | 🇧🇪 BE | 14 | 1 | 3 | CAIDA |
| AS50300 CustodianDC Limited | 🇬🇧 GB | 9 | 39 | 3 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
No downstreams observed at the collectors.
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.