AS49653 CADF S.p.A 🇮🇹 IT
Announcing 3 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
3
5,120 (20 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
0
-
Upstreams
2
transit providers observed
Peers
13
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
0
transit customers observed
Customer cone
0
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS49653
- Name
- CADF S.p.A
- Organisation
- Delta Web S.p.a
- Country
- 🇮🇹 IT
- RIR
- RIPENCC
- Allocated
- 2009-07-21
- Network type
- Cable/DSL/ISP
- Traffic levels
- 1-5Gbps
- Scope
- Regional
- Peering policy
- Open
- Website
- http://www.deltawebferrara.it/
- PeeringDB
- net/7393
- Exchanges
- 3
- Facilities
- 1
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS174 Cogent Communications, LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 65,689 | 3,967 | 36 | CAIDA |
| AS28716 Retelit Digital Services S.p.A. | 🇮🇹 IT | 117 | 47 | 36 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 53,580 | 185 | 15 | CAIDA |
| AS3216 Vimpelcom PJSC | 🇷🇺 RU | 24,939 | 590 | 3 | CAIDA |
| AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions | 🇧🇫 BF | 23,626 | 64 | 3 | CAIDA |
| AS50673 Serverius Holding B.V. | 🇳🇱 NL | 16,059 | 131 | 3 | CAIDA |
| AS34927 iFog GmbH | 🇨🇠CH | 15,444 | 38 | 3 | CAIDA |
| AS24482 SG.GS | 🇸🇬 SG | 4,709 | 45 | 3 | CAIDA |
| AS49559 A-Systems Sp. z o.o. | 🇵🇱 PL | 113 | 11 | 3 | CAIDA |
| AS20766 Association "Gitoyen" | 🇫🇷 FR | 18 | 6 | 3 | CAIDA |
| AS48362 Stadtwerke Feldkirch | 🇦🇹 AT | 16 | 8 | 3 | CAIDA |
| AS48185 team.blue NV | 🇧🇪 BE | 14 | 1 | 3 | CAIDA |
| AS50300 CustodianDC Limited | 🇬🇧 GB | 9 | 39 | 3 | CAIDA |
| AS59919 Brainbox S.r.l. | 🇮🇹 IT | 2 | 8 | 3 | CAIDA |
| AS3333 Reseaux IP Europeens Network Coordination Centre (RIPE NCC) | 🇳🇱 NL | 0 | 7 | 3 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
No downstreams observed at the collectors.
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.