AS49823 Hastingwood Securities Ltd 🇬🇧 GB

Announcing 19 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
19
12,288 (48 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
0
-
Upstreams
14
transit providers observed
Peers
4
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
0
transit customers observed
Customer cone
0
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS49823
Name
Hastingwood Securities Ltd
Organisation
Hastingwood Securities
Country
🇬🇧 GB
RIR
RIPENCC
Allocated
2009-09-24
Scope
Not Disclosed
Peering policy
Open
IRR as-set
RIPE::AS-HASTINGWOOD
PeeringDB
net/25614

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

19 valid (100.0%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 0 no ROA (0.0%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS174 Cogent Communications, LLC 🇺🇸 US 66,330 3,955 33 CAIDA
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC 🇺🇸 US 54,955 185 130 inferred
AS9002 RETN Limited 🇬🇧 GB 52,849 18 33 CAIDA
AS33891 Core-Backbone GmbH 🇩🇪 DE 26,778 1 16 inferred
AS3216 Vimpelcom PJSC 🇷🇺 RU 24,741 591 16 inferred
AS20562 Open Peering (Broadband Hosting B.V.) 🇳🇱 NL 23,975 0 16 inferred
AS31500 Global Network Management Inc 🇦🇬 AG 21,492 40 3 inferred
AS34549 meerfarbig GmbH & Co. KG 🇩🇪 DE 15,641 48 76 inferred
AS17639 Converge ICT Solutions Inc. 🇵🇭 PH 272 567 19 inferred
AS29075 IELO-LIAZO SERVICES SAS 🇫🇷 FR 202 23 19 inferred
AS12779 IT.Gate S.p.A. 🇮🇹 IT 76 25 16 inferred
AS50304 Blix Solutions AS 🇳🇴 NO 34 103 38 inferred
AS48362 Stadtwerke Feldkirch 🇦🇹 AT 16 8 19 inferred
AS50300 CustodianDC Limited 🇬🇧 GB 9 39 19 inferred

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions 🇧🇫 BF 23,884 64 19 CAIDA
AS15830 Equinix, Inc. 🇳🇱 NL 18,517 1,079 16 CAIDA
AS24482 SG.GS 🇸🇬 SG 4,871 45 19 CAIDA
AS48185 team.blue NV 🇧🇪 BE 14 1 19 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

No downstreams observed at the collectors.

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.