AS49823 Hastingwood Securities Ltd 🇬🇧 GB

Announcing 19 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
19
12,288 (48 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
0
-
Upstreams
3
transit providers observed
Peers
16
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
0
transit customers observed
Customer cone
0
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS49823
Name
Hastingwood Securities Ltd
Organisation
Hastingwood Securities
Country
🇬🇧 GB
RIR
RIPENCC
Allocated
2009-09-24
Scope
Not Disclosed
Peering policy
Open
IRR as-set
RIPE::AS-HASTINGWOOD
PeeringDB
net/25614

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

19 valid (100.0%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 0 no ROA (0.0%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS174 Cogent Communications, LLC 🇺🇸 US 65,907 3,881 33 CAIDA
AS9002 RETN Limited 🇬🇧 GB 51,459 14 30 CAIDA
AS7575 Australian Academic and Research Network (AARNet) 🇦🇺 AU 19,548 202 10 inferred

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC 🇺🇸 US 54,635 240 130 CAIDA
AS4657 StarHub Ltd 🇸🇬 SG 35,390 208 19 CAIDA
AS33891 Core-Backbone GmbH 🇩🇪 DE 27,650 1 35 CAIDA
AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions 🇧🇫 BF 25,408 64 19 CAIDA
AS3216 PJSC Vimpelcom 🇷🇺 RU 23,092 591 16 CAIDA
AS31500 Global Network Management Inc 🇦🇬 AG 20,182 40 3 CAIDA
AS24482 SG.GS 🇸🇬 SG 20,181 45 19 CAIDA
AS20562 Open Peering (Broadband Hosting B.V.) 🇳🇱 NL 20,175 0 16 CAIDA
AS34549 meerfarbig GmbH & Co. KG 🇩🇪 DE 19,592 47 57 CAIDA
AS17639 Converge ICT Solutions Inc. 🇵🇭 PH 229 575 19 CAIDA
AS29075 IELO-LIAZO SERVICES SAS 🇫🇷 FR 196 23 16 CAIDA
AS12779 IT.Gate S.p.A. 🇮🇹 IT 75 25 16 CAIDA
AS50304 Blix Solutions AS 🇳🇴 NO 33 97 38 CAIDA
AS48362 Stadtwerke Feldkirch 🇦🇹 AT 16 7 19 CAIDA
AS48185 team.blue NV 🇧🇪 BE 14 1 19 CAIDA
AS50300 CustodianDC Limited 🇬🇧 GB 9 39 19 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

No downstreams observed at the collectors.

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.