AS49824 PC "Astra-net" πΊπ¦ UA
Announcing 40 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
23
8,448 (33 Γ /24)
IPv6 prefixes
17
17 Γ /48
Upstreams
6
transit providers observed
Peers
6
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
17
transit customers observed
Customer cone
26
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS49824
- Name
- PC "Astra-net"
- Organisation
- Astra-net
- Country
- πΊπ¦ UA
- RIR
- RIPENCC
- Allocated
- 2009-09-24
- Network type
- Cable/DSL/ISP
- Traffic levels
- 300-500Gbps
- Scope
- Europe
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
- AS-ACTPA
- Website
- https://astra.in.ua/
- Looking glass
- https://lg.astra.in.ua/
- PeeringDB
- net/18055
- Exchanges
- 12
- Facilities
- 3
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS1299 Arelion (fka. Telia Carrier) | πΈπͺ SE | 68,700 | 132 | 836 | CAIDA |
| AS6663 TΓΌrk Telekom International | π·π΄ RO | 24,815 | 48 | 473 | CAIDA |
| AS201054 Stowarzyszenie e-Poludnie | π΅π± PL | 17,562 | 0 | 13 | inferred |
| AS56655 Gigahost AS | π³π΄ NO | 15,214 | 33 | 14 | inferred |
| AS50263 A-Systems Sp. z o.o. | π΅π± PL | 1,378 | 1 | 767 | CAIDA |
| AS29632 Netassist International EOOD | π§π¬ BG | 41 | 0 | 8 | inferred |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | πΊπΈ US | 52,796 | 235 | 367 | CAIDA |
| AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions | π§π« BF | 21,462 | 64 | 43 | CAIDA |
| AS3303 Swisscom (Schweiz) AG | π¨π CH | 20,230 | 345 | 11 | CAIDA |
| AS34927 iFog GmbH | π¨π CH | 15,201 | 38 | 37 | CAIDA |
| AS24482 SG.GS | πΈπ¬ SG | 4,641 | 45 | 65 | CAIDA |
| AS208972 GIBIRNet Iletisim | πΉπ· TR | 418 | 89 | 9 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.