AS50061 PricewaterhouseCoopers GmbH WPG 🇩🇪 DE

Announcing 4 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
3
3,584 (14 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
1
1 × /32
Upstreams
6
transit providers observed
Peers
12
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
0
transit customers observed
Customer cone
0
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS50061
Name
PricewaterhouseCoopers GmbH WPG
Organisation
PricewaterhouseCoopers DE
Country
🇩🇪 DE
RIR
RIPENCC
Allocated
2009-11-06
Network type
Enterprise
Traffic levels
50-100Gbps
Scope
Europe
Peering policy
Open
IRR as-set
RIPE::AS-PWC
Website
http://pwc.com
PeeringDB
net/12103
Exchanges
1
Facilities
2

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

4 valid (100.0%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 0 no ROA (0.0%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS3356 Lumen (Level 3) 🇺🇸 US 70,988 2,082 43 CAIDA
AS1299 Arelion (fka. Telia Carrier) 🇸🇪 SE 68,279 135 34 CAIDA
AS3320 Deutsche Telekom AG 🇩🇪 DE 48,536 910 4 CAIDA
AS29632 Netassist International EOOD 🇧🇬 BG 45 0 1 inferred
AS56662 Marcin Gondek 🇵🇱 PL 0 0 1 inferred
AS213241 TECHIT.BE SRL 🇧🇪 BE 0 14 1 inferred

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC 🇺🇸 US 52,986 185 27 CAIDA
AS20485 TransTeleCom JSC 🇷🇺 RU 28,307 85 3 CAIDA
AS33891 Core-Backbone GmbH 🇩🇪 DE 24,867 1 4 CAIDA
AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions 🇧🇫 BF 21,712 63 5 CAIDA
AS34549 meerfarbig GmbH & Co. KG 🇩🇪 DE 15,691 48 13 CAIDA
AS24482 SG.GS 🇸🇬 SG 4,949 45 4 CAIDA
AS17639 Converge ICT Solutions Inc. 🇵🇭 PH 274 567 1 CAIDA
AS12779 IT.Gate S.p.A. 🇮🇹 IT 76 25 3 CAIDA
AS1836 green.ch AG 🇨🇭 CH 43 78 4 CAIDA
AS34019 Hivane Association 🇫🇷 FR 38 6 4 CAIDA
AS48362 Stadtwerke Feldkirch 🇦🇹 AT 16 8 4 CAIDA
AS212024 Marc Schmitt 🇫🇷 FR 0 1 4 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

No downstreams observed at the collectors.

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.