AS51055 Bridge Fibre Limited 🇬🇧 GB

Announcing 9 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
7
6,400 (25 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
2
2 × /32
Upstreams
2
transit providers observed
Peers
15
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
1
transit customers observed
Customer cone
2
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS51055
Name
Bridge Fibre Limited
Organisation
Bridge Fibre Ltd
Country
🇬🇧 GB
RIR
RIPENCC
Allocated
2011-02-07
Network type
NSP
Traffic levels
5-10Gbps
Scope
Regional
Peering policy
Open
IRR as-set
AS-BRIDGEFIBRE
PeeringDB
net/8027
Exchanges
2
Facilities
2

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

9 valid (100.0%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 0 no ROA (0.0%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS3356 Lumen (Level 3) 🇺🇸 US 72,574 2,067 84 CAIDA
AS2914 NTT America, Inc. 🇺🇸 US 58,924 1,678 94 CAIDA

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC 🇺🇸 US 56,886 237 77 CAIDA
AS4657 StarHub Ltd 🇸🇬 SG 38,361 208 9 CAIDA
AS33891 Core-Backbone GmbH 🇩🇪 DE 30,230 1 16 CAIDA
AS3216 PJSC Vimpelcom 🇷🇺 RU 26,136 591 8 CAIDA
AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions 🇧🇫 BF 23,928 64 9 CAIDA
AS24482 SG.GS 🇸🇬 SG 23,735 45 11 CAIDA
AS34549 meerfarbig GmbH & Co. KG 🇩🇪 DE 20,072 47 27 CAIDA
AS8218 Zayo Europe 🇫🇷 FR 355 19 2 CAIDA
AS17639 Converge ICT Solutions Inc. 🇵🇭 PH 239 575 8 CAIDA
AS29075 IELO-LIAZO SERVICES SAS 🇫🇷 FR 203 23 8 CAIDA
AS12779 IT.Gate S.p.A. 🇮🇹 IT 75 25 8 CAIDA
AS50304 Blix Solutions AS 🇳🇴 NO 33 97 16 CAIDA
AS48362 Stadtwerke Feldkirch 🇦🇹 AT 17 7 2 CAIDA
AS48185 team.blue NV 🇧🇪 BE 14 1 10 CAIDA
AS50300 CustodianDC Limited 🇬🇧 GB 10 39 10 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS11939 THE MATHWORKS, INC. 🇺🇸 US 0 25 49 CAIDA

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.