AS51263 County Broadband Ltd 🇬🇧 GB

Announcing 15 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
14
20,480 (80 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
1
8 × /32
Upstreams
6
transit providers observed
Peers
13
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
0
transit customers observed
Customer cone
0
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS51263
Name
County Broadband Ltd
Organisation
County Broadband Ltd
Country
🇬🇧 GB
RIR
RIPENCC
Allocated
2010-07-05
Network type
Cable/DSL/ISP
Traffic levels
50-100Gbps
Scope
Regional
Peering policy
Open
IRR as-set
AS-CBB
PeeringDB
net/6377
Exchanges
3
Facilities
3

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

15 valid (100.0%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 0 no ROA (0.0%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS3356 Lumen (Level 3) 🇺🇸 US 70,614 2,073 47 CAIDA
AS174 Cogent Communications, LLC 🇺🇸 US 65,392 4,020 191 CAIDA
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC 🇺🇸 US 52,857 235 193 CAIDA
AS6461 Zayo Bandwidth 🇺🇸 US 49,702 212 52 CAIDA
AS8943 Jump Networks Ltd 🇬🇧 GB 15 7 4 CAIDA
AS41847 Daniel O'Mahony 🇬🇧 GB 4 9 76 CAIDA

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS33891 Core-Backbone GmbH 🇩🇪 DE 24,724 1 1 CAIDA
AS3216 Vimpelcom PJSC 🇷🇺 RU 23,758 590 1 CAIDA
AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions 🇧🇫 BF 21,661 64 1 CAIDA
AS15830 Equinix, Inc. 🇳🇱 NL 18,321 1,082 9 CAIDA
AS34549 meerfarbig GmbH & Co. KG 🇩🇪 DE 15,599 48 3 CAIDA
AS24482 SG.GS 🇸🇬 SG 4,960 45 15 CAIDA
AS8218 Zayo Europe 🇫🇷 FR 342 19 14 CAIDA
AS17639 Converge ICT Solutions Inc. 🇵🇭 PH 272 567 1 CAIDA
AS12779 IT.Gate S.p.A. 🇮🇹 IT 75 25 1 CAIDA
AS50304 Blix Solutions AS 🇳🇴 NO 34 97 2 CAIDA
AS48362 Stadtwerke Feldkirch 🇦🇹 AT 15 8 1 CAIDA
AS48185 team.blue NV 🇧🇪 BE 14 1 15 CAIDA
AS50300 CustodianDC Limited 🇬🇧 GB 9 39 15 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

No downstreams observed at the collectors.

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.