AS51758 ProcoliX B.V. πŸ‡³πŸ‡± NL

Announcing 5 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
4
3,584 (14 Γ— /24)
IPv6 prefixes
1
1 Γ— /32
Upstreams
4
transit providers observed
Peers
15
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
0
transit customers observed
Customer cone
0
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS51758
Name
ProcoliX B.V.
Organisation
ProcoliX
Country
πŸ‡³πŸ‡± NL
RIR
RIPENCC
Allocated
2010-11-01
Network type
Enterprise
Scope
Europe
Peering policy
Open
IRR as-set
AS-PROCOLIX
PeeringDB
net/27399
Exchanges
4
Facilities
4

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

4 valid (80.0%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 1 no ROA (20.0%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS20562 Open Peering (Broadband Hosting B.V.) πŸ‡³πŸ‡± NL 20,984 0 59 CAIDA
AS24785 Joint Transit (Broadband Hosting B.V.) πŸ‡³πŸ‡± NL 20,494 21 67 CAIDA
AS29632 Netassist International EOOD πŸ‡§πŸ‡¬ BG 44 0 1 inferred
AS56662 Marcin Gondek πŸ‡΅πŸ‡± PL 0 0 1 inferred

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 55,231 236 32 CAIDA
AS20485 JSC TransTeleCom πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί RU 28,600 85 4 CAIDA
AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions πŸ‡§πŸ‡« BF 26,302 64 5 CAIDA
AS24482 SG.GS πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬ SG 20,966 45 5 CAIDA
AS50673 Serverius Holding B.V. πŸ‡³πŸ‡± NL 20,882 135 1 CAIDA
AS34927 iFog GmbH πŸ‡¨πŸ‡­ CH 20,300 40 3 CAIDA
AS17639 Converge ICT Solutions Inc. πŸ‡΅πŸ‡­ PH 696 575 4 CAIDA
AS6696 VERIXI SA πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺ BE 168 49 4 CAIDA
AS34019 Hivane Association πŸ‡«πŸ‡· FR 39 6 1 CAIDA
AS1103 SURF B.V. πŸ‡³πŸ‡± NL 30 99 1 CAIDA
AS58057 Securebit AG πŸ‡¨πŸ‡­ CH 20 14 1 CAIDA
AS48185 team.blue NV πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺ BE 14 1 5 CAIDA
AS204092 Association GRIFON πŸ‡«πŸ‡· FR 10 2 4 CAIDA
AS3333 Reseaux IP Europeens Network Coordination Centre (RIPE NCC) πŸ‡³πŸ‡± NL 0 7 4 CAIDA
AS202365 Chronos πŸ‡ΉπŸ‡· TR 0 4 3 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

No downstreams observed at the collectors.

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.