AS52559 NOVATEC TELECOM LTDA 🇧🇷 BR
Announcing 25 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
19
17,408 (68 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
6
1.2 × /32
Upstreams
3
transit providers observed
Peers
3
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
5
transit customers observed
Customer cone
5
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS52559
- Name
- NOVATEC TELECOM LTDA
- Organisation
- Novatec Telecom
- Country
- 🇧🇷 BR
- RIR
- LACNIC
- Allocated
- 2013-02-14
- Network type
- NSP
- Traffic levels
- 20-50Gbps
- Scope
- South America
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
- AS52559
- Website
- http://www.novatecnet.com.br
- Looking glass
- https://bgp.he.net/AS52559#_graph4
- PeeringDB
- net/12956
- Exchanges
- 2
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS3356 Lumen (Level 3) | 🇺🇸 US | 70,619 | 2,076 | 747 | CAIDA |
| AS263009 FORTE TELECOM LTDA. | 🇧🇷 BR | 19,947 | 6 | 484 | CAIDA |
| AS28173 Dinamica Telecomunicacoes Ltda | 🇧🇷 BR | 166 | 63 | 98 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS35280 F5 Networks SARL | 🇫🇷 FR | 21,738 | 59 | 1 | CAIDA |
| AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions | 🇧🇫 BF | 20,784 | 64 | 23 | CAIDA |
| AS24482 SG.GS | 🇸🇬 SG | 4,776 | 45 | 26 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS263116 HELP NET TELECOM E INFORMÁTICA LTDA - ME | 🇧🇷 BR | 0 | 6 | 286 | CAIDA |
| AS263112 NETDRP SERVIÇOS DE INTERNET LTDA. | 🇧🇷 BR | 0 | 5 | 244 | CAIDA |
| AS268484 AIRNET INTERNET TELECOM | 🇧🇷 BR | 0 | 2 | 42 | CAIDA |
| AS269460 NEW NET LG SOLUCOES TELECOMUNICACOES E INFORMATICA | 🇧🇷 BR | 0 | 4 | 16 | CAIDA |
| AS274658 Simone Pastore ME | 🇧🇷 BR | 0 | 0 | 3 | inferred |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.