AS52617 DIGITAL.COM TELECOMUNICACOES LTDA 🇧🇷 BR
Announcing 12 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
9
6,144 (24 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
3
2 × /32
Upstreams
5
transit providers observed
Peers
2
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
1
transit customers observed
Customer cone
2
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS52617
- Name
- DIGITAL.COM TELECOMUNICACOES LTDA
- Organisation
- DIGITAL.COM TELECOMUNICACOES LTDA
- Country
- 🇧🇷 BR
- RIR
- LACNIC
- Allocated
- 2013-03-28
- Network type
- Cable/DSL/ISP
- Traffic levels
- 20-50Gbps
- Scope
- South America
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
- AS52617:AS-WF
- Website
- https://digitalnetmg.com.br/
- Looking glass
- https://lg.provedordigitalnet.net.br/
- PeeringDB
- net/12556
- Exchanges
- 5
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 53,561 | 235 | 94 | inferred |
| AS52468 UFINET PANAMA S.A. | 🇵🇦 PA | 23,418 | 965 | 31 | CAIDA |
| AS35280 F5 Networks SARL | 🇫🇷 FR | 21,738 | 59 | 8 | inferred |
| AS263444 Open X Tecnologia Ltda | 🇧🇷 BR | 21,426 | 11 | 115 | CAIDA |
| AS14840 BR.DIGITAL | 🇧🇷 BR | 3,363 | 82 | 55 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions | 🇧🇫 BF | 20,784 | 64 | 6 | CAIDA |
| AS24482 SG.GS | 🇸🇬 SG | 4,776 | 45 | 9 | CAIDA |
| AS53013 Ufinet Brasil (WixNet do Brasil) | 🇧🇷 BR | 56 | 20 | 4 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS52923 Netcar Internet Telec Info e Tecnologia LTDA | 🇧🇷 BR | 0 | 15 | 42 | CAIDA |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.