AS52705 FRANET TELECOM π§π· BR
Announcing 10 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
7
3,072 (12 Γ /24)
IPv6 prefixes
3
1 Γ /32
Upstreams
7
transit providers observed
Peers
1
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
4
transit customers observed
Customer cone
5
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS52705
- Name
- FRANET TELECOM
- Organisation
- FRANET TELECOM
- Country
- π§π· BR
- RIR
- LACNIC
- Allocated
- 2012-12-26
- Network type
- NSP
- Scope
- Regional
- Peering policy
- Open
- Website
- https://www.franet.com.br/
- PeeringDB
- net/18876
- Exchanges
- 2
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS52468 UFINET PANAMA S.A. | π΅π¦ PA | 23,125 | 964 | 63 | CAIDA |
| AS267613 ELETRONET S.A. | π§π· BR | 19,865 | 5 | 234 | CAIDA |
| AS28146 MHNET TELECOM | π§π· BR | 19,524 | 198 | 142 | CAIDA |
| AS262847 DBUG TELECOM LTDA | π§π· BR | 96 | 36 | 117 | CAIDA |
| AS33182 HostDime.com, Inc. | πΊπΈ US | 71 | 85 | 7 | CAIDA |
| AS263569 DIRECT INTERNET LTDA | π§π· BR | 10 | 43 | 42 | CAIDA |
| AS266989 ETH ENTERPRISE TECNOLOGIA LTDA | π§π· BR | 8 | 3 | 3 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS24482 SG.GS | πΈπ¬ SG | 4,610 | 45 | 2 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS274512 V MIX DESENVOLVIMENTO DE SOFTWARE LTDA | π§π· BR | 0 | 2 | 114 | CAIDA |
| AS269453 Jabanet | π§π· BR | 0 | 1 | 75 | CAIDA |
| AS270747 WSS SERVICOS DE COMUNICACAO LTDA | π§π· BR | 0 | 1 | 42 | CAIDA |
| AS268958 MercadomΓ³veis Ltda | π§π· BR | 0 | 1 | 27 | CAIDA |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.