AS52752 Vegas Telecom Informática Ltda. 🇧🇷 BR

Vegas Telecom Informática Ltda.. Announcing 24 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
21
6,912 (27 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
3
1.5 × /32
Upstreams
12
transit providers observed
Peers
0
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
2
transit customers observed
Customer cone
7
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS52752
Name
Vegas Telecom Informática Ltda.
Organisation
Hi7 Telecom
Country
🇧🇷 BR
RIR
LACNIC
Allocated
2012-08-30
Network type
NSP
Traffic levels
50-100Gbps
Scope
South America
Peering policy
Selective
IRR as-set
AS52752:AS-VEGAS
PeeringDB
net/6196
Facilities
2

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

0 valid (0.0%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 24 no ROA (100.0%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS16735 Algar Telecom 🇧🇷 BR 31,235 46 48 CAIDA
AS52873 Softdados Telecomunicações 🇧🇷 BR 413 13 1,162 CAIDA
AS52554 Rede MegasNet Telecomunicações 🇧🇷 BR 287 8 246 CAIDA
AS262907 Brasil TecPar 🇧🇷 BR 233 534 7 CAIDA
AS266525 Eurocorp Vialux Internet Eireli 🇧🇷 BR 44 5 341 CAIDA
AS270724 CLIENT.CO SERVIÇOS E TELECOMUNICAÇÕES LTDA 🇧🇷 BR 36 14 391 CAIDA
AS272659 Neton Comércio e Serviços de Informática Ltda ME 🇧🇷 BR 14 0 43 CAIDA
AS266399 NUDOZE TELECOMUNICACOES EIRELI 🇧🇷 BR 9 7 45 CAIDA
AS264897 SKYMAX TELECOMUNICAÇÕES LTDA ME 🇧🇷 BR 8 4 45 CAIDA
AS271007 FRANCINE TALLIS LOURENZONI RIBEIRO INFORMATICA 🇧🇷 BR 8 5 45 CAIDA
AS274594 MASTER FIBRA TELECOM 🇧🇷 BR 8 1 44 CAIDA
AS267563 Ei Telecom LTDA 🇧🇷 BR 6 11 6 inferred

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

No peers observed at the collectors.

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS61714 supercore tecnologia e informatica eirelli 🇧🇷 BR 4 4 1,408 CAIDA
AS2 University of Delaware 🇺🇸 US 2 11 7 CAIDA

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.