AS52988 PLENA TELECOM πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR

Announcing 4 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
3
6,400 (25 Γ— /24)
IPv6 prefixes
1
1 Γ— /32
Upstreams
1
transit providers observed
Peers
0
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
13
transit customers observed
Customer cone
17
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS52988
Name
PLENA TELECOM
Organisation
Plena Telecom
Country
πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR
RIR
LACNIC
Allocated
2011-04-26
Network type
Cable/DSL/ISP
Traffic levels
50-100Gbps
Scope
Regional
Peering policy
Selective
IRR as-set
AS-PLENA
PeeringDB
net/6875
Exchanges
1

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

0 valid (0.0%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 4 no ROA (100.0%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS263080 GTi TELECOMUNICACOES S/A πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 53 2 1,821 CAIDA

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

No peers observed at the collectors.

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS264513 R H M NET LTDA - ME πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 3 6 132 CAIDA
AS262805 REDE MINAS TELECOM LTDA πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 3 20 43 CAIDA
AS271425 Terracel Provedor de Internet Ltda Me πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 2 3 267 CAIDA
AS274659 JEJ NET πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 2 1 94 CAIDA
AS266052 Interviva Telecom e ServiΓ§os LTDA ME πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 0 6 258 CAIDA
AS264391 Newnet Telecom Ltda πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 0 5 254 CAIDA
AS264530 JPP PANCINI LTDA πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 0 5 248 CAIDA
AS267136 redenet provedor ltda me πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 0 3 119 CAIDA
AS272474 NEW WORD INFORMATICA LTDA πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 0 0 99 inferred
AS262351 SITE - Soluc. em Inf. Telec. e Eng. Ltda. - BRSITE πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 0 3 81 CAIDA
AS268122 Link Net TelecomunicaΓ§Γ΅es Ltda - ME πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 0 3 43 CAIDA
AS270643 Vixcel Tecnologia Ltda πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 0 5 13 CAIDA
AS275762 INFINIT NET TELECOM LTDA πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 0 0 7 inferred

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.