AS53038 IDC19 - WDI SOLUCOES EM TEC INFORMACAO LTDA ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ท BR

IDC19 SOLUCOES EM TECNOLOGIA DA INFORMACAO LTDA. Announcing 28 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
27
8,448 (33 ร— /24)
IPv6 prefixes
1
1 ร— /32
Upstreams
7
transit providers observed
Peers
2
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
3
transit customers observed
Customer cone
3
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS53038
Name
IDC19 - WDI SOLUCOES EM TEC INFORMACAO LTDA
Organisation
IDC19 - Intelligent Data Center
Country
๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ท BR
RIR
LACNIC
Allocated
2011-09-05
Network type
Content
Scope
Not Disclosed
Peering policy
Open
IRR as-set
AS53038:AS-ANNOUNCEMENTS
PeeringDB
net/30454
Exchanges
3
Facilities
4

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

28 valid (100.0%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 0 no ROA (0.0%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS3356 Lumen (Level 3) ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ US 72,789 2,073 320 CAIDA
AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ซ BF 38,722 64 6 inferred
AS264409 Huge Networks ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ท BR 38,245 7 450 CAIDA
AS13786 Seaborn (Seabras USA, LLC) ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ US 38,245 8 344 CAIDA
AS16735 Algar Telecom ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ท BR 38,245 46 197 CAIDA
AS61610 ELEA DATA CENTERS ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ท BR 15 13 15 CAIDA
AS55286 B2 Net Solutions Inc. ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ US 7 797 41 CAIDA

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ US 57,043 240 226 CAIDA
AS24482 SG.GS ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฌ SG 38,371 45 26 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS273612 FABWEB SERVICOS DE INTERNET LTDA ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ท BR 0 3 228 CAIDA
AS61692 Mundo 7 Soluรงรตes em informรกtica LTDA - ME ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ท BR 0 4 201 CAIDA
AS274554 NUCLEO BRASIL SERVIDORES LTDA ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ท BR 0 0 32 inferred

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.