AS53173 Sobral Telecomunicações Ltda 🇧🇷 BR

Sobral Telecomunicações Ltda. Announcing 17 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
10
7,168 (28 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
7
4,129 × /48
Upstreams
5
transit providers observed
Peers
3
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
7
transit customers observed
Customer cone
17
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS53173
Name
Sobral Telecomunicações Ltda
Organisation
SOBRALNET
Country
🇧🇷 BR
RIR
LACNIC
Allocated
2010-07-30
Network type
Cable/DSL/ISP
Traffic levels
50-100Gbps
Scope
Regional
Peering policy
Open
IRR as-set
AS53173:AS-CONE-ALL
PeeringDB
net/8225
Exchanges
2
Facilities
2

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

0 valid (0.0%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 17 no ROA (100.0%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS13786 Seaborn (Seabras USA, LLC) 🇺🇸 US 31,302 8 59 CAIDA
AS52320 V.tal (GlobeNet) 🇨🇴 CO 30,029 5 597 CAIDA
AS37468 Angola Cables 🇦🇴 AO 29,452 15 452 CAIDA
AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions 🇧🇫 BF 23,879 64 5 inferred
AS61832 Giga+ Empresas 🇧🇷 BR 20,440 38 10 CAIDA

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC 🇺🇸 US 54,403 185 211 CAIDA
AS35280 F5 Networks SARL 🇫🇷 FR 24,315 59 5 CAIDA
AS24482 SG.GS 🇸🇬 SG 4,874 45 31 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS265335 PLANETA NET TELECOM 🇧🇷 BR 7 12 74 CAIDA
AS271215 4CJ SERVICOS E TELECOMUNICACOES LTDA 🇧🇷 BR 3 3 212 CAIDA
AS272284 Fox Net Telecom 🇧🇷 BR 2 0 148 CAIDA
AS273671 Acesso com 🇧🇷 BR 0 3 196 CAIDA
AS266458 MEGGANET INTERNET E INFORMATICA LTDA 🇧🇷 BR 0 3 101 CAIDA
AS271493 SPEED NET PEDRA 🇧🇷 BR 0 63 77 CAIDA
AS263309 LaraNet Telecomunicações e Serviços EIRALI 🇧🇷 BR 0 5 44 CAIDA

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.