AS53178 SCNet Equipamentos de Informática Ltda 🇧🇷 BR

SCNet Equipamentos de Informática Ltda. Announcing 28 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
24
19,456 (76 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
4
2.1 × /32
Upstreams
3
transit providers observed
Peers
4
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
7
transit customers observed
Customer cone
12
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS53178
Name
SCNet Equipamentos de Informática Ltda
Organisation
SCNET TELECOMUNICAÇÕES LTDA
Country
🇧🇷 BR
RIR
LACNIC
Allocated
2010-08-12
Network type
Cable/DSL/ISP
Traffic levels
100-200Gbps
Scope
Regional
Peering policy
Open
IRR as-set
TC::AS-ANNOUNCEMENTS
PeeringDB
net/6796
Exchanges
4

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

0 valid (0.0%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 28 no ROA (100.0%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS16735 Algar Telecom 🇧🇷 BR 31,311 46 259 CAIDA
AS53062 ACESSOLINE TELECOMUNICACOES LTDA 🇧🇷 BR 20,804 91 584 CAIDA
AS28283 Adyl Telecom 🇧🇷 BR 983 7 183 CAIDA

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC 🇺🇸 US 54,742 185 244 CAIDA
AS35280 F5 Networks SARL 🇫🇷 FR 24,353 59 16 CAIDA
AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions 🇧🇫 BF 23,910 64 18 CAIDA
AS24482 SG.GS 🇸🇬 SG 4,871 45 29 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS53097 SUPERIP TELECOMUNICAÇÕES 🇧🇷 BR 5 15 15 CAIDA
AS262727 AtualNet Provedor de Internet Ltda 🇧🇷 BR 2 39 40 CAIDA
AS265083 UltraWeb Telecomunicações LTDA 🇧🇷 BR 0 3 238 CAIDA
AS61671 LIGMAIS TELECOMUNICAÇÃO 🇧🇷 BR 0 3 166 CAIDA
AS268992 IDF Informática LTDA ME 🇧🇷 BR 0 3 106 CAIDA
AS265350 EL Informática Ltda ME 🇧🇷 BR 0 3 39 CAIDA
AS265932 Cooperativa Regional Auriverde 🇧🇷 BR 0 1 1 CAIDA

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.