AS53182 LAZERNET.COM.BR LTDA 🇧🇷 BR
lazernet.com.br ltda me. Announcing 22 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
21
12,288 (48 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
1
1 × /32
Upstreams
3
transit providers observed
Peers
4
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
4
transit customers observed
Customer cone
4
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS53182
- Name
- LAZERNET.COM.BR LTDA
- Organisation
- lazernet.com.br ltda me
- Country
- 🇧🇷 BR
- RIR
- LACNIC
- Allocated
- 2010-08-18
- Network type
- Cable/DSL/ISP
- Traffic levels
- 5-10Gbps
- Scope
- Regional
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
- AS53182
- Website
- http://www.lazernet.com.br
- PeeringDB
- net/38041
- Facilities
- 1
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS52468 UFINET PANAMA S.A. | 🇵🇦 PA | 30,379 | 982 | 212 | CAIDA |
| AS61775 AW Fibra | 🇧🇷 BR | 20 | 4 | 185 | CAIDA |
| AS262940 Gigabyte Informatica | 🇧🇷 BR | 6 | 7 | 30 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 57,673 | 238 | 158 | CAIDA |
| AS35280 F5 Networks SARL | 🇫🇷 FR | 34,858 | 60 | 13 | CAIDA |
| AS24482 SG.GS | 🇸🇬 SG | 23,565 | 45 | 19 | CAIDA |
| AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions | 🇧🇫 BF | 22,816 | 64 | 13 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS263389 AT INFORMATICA | 🇧🇷 BR | 0 | 4 | 54 | CAIDA |
| AS266526 Ub Informática | 🇧🇷 BR | 0 | 5 | 16 | CAIDA |
| AS268948 2B BANDA LARGA | 🇧🇷 BR | 0 | 4 | 11 | CAIDA |
| AS274599 Silva & Silva Tecnologia e Fibra Óptica LTDA | 🇧🇷 BR | 0 | 0 | 1 | inferred |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.