AS54650 Pathwayz Communications, Inc. πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US

Announcing 11 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
10
2,560 (10 Γ— /24)
IPv6 prefixes
1
1 Γ— /32
Upstreams
2
transit providers observed
Peers
4
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
8
transit customers observed
Customer cone
9
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS54650
Name
Pathwayz Communications, Inc.
Organisation
Pathwayz Communications
Country
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US
RIR
ARIN
Allocated
2012-04-18
Network type
Cable/DSL/ISP
Traffic levels
10-20Gbps
Scope
Regional
Peering policy
Open
IRR as-set
AS-54650:AS-ALL
PeeringDB
net/38476

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

10 valid (90.9%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 1 no ROA (9.1%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS174 Cogent Communications, LLC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 67,341 3,938 169 CAIDA
AS6461 Zayo Bandwidth πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 56,793 225 388 CAIDA

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 56,591 236 79 CAIDA
AS25091 IP-Max SA πŸ‡¨πŸ‡­ CH 196 25 1 CAIDA
AS971 PureVoltage Hosting Inc. πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 52 1 15 CAIDA
AS14907 Wikimedia Foundation Inc. πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 0 11 17 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS138454 Trinity Fellowship πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 0 1 42 CAIDA
AS26698 PARAMOUNT SOFTWARE ASSOCIATES, INC. πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 0 1 42 CAIDA
AS398015 MicroFour, Inc. πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 0 2 42 CAIDA
AS32917 Randall County Texas πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 0 1 41 CAIDA
AS397140 Amarillo National Bank πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 0 2 13 CAIDA
AS399142 Randall County Sheriff's Office πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 0 1 12 CAIDA
AS399262 Westgate Computers Data Center, LLC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 0 1 12 CAIDA
AS394770 Axigent Technologies Group, Inc. πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 0 2 11 CAIDA

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.