AS55355 HGC Global Communications 🇭🇰 HK

HGC Global Communications Limited. Announcing 27 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
27
6,912 (27 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
0
-
Upstreams
4
transit providers observed
Peers
4
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
6
transit customers observed
Customer cone
8
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS55355
Name
HGC Global Communications
Organisation
HGC Global Commnications
Country
🇭🇰 HK
RIR
APNIC
Allocated
2010-01-04
Network type
NSP
Traffic levels
50-100Gbps
Scope
Asia Pacific
Peering policy
Selective
PeeringDB
net/23628
Exchanges
2

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

18 valid (66.7%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 9 no ROA (33.3%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS6453 TATA Communications (America) Inc 🇺🇸 US 55,796 123 63 CAIDA
AS15412 Flag Telecom UK Limited 🇬🇧 GB 45,472 19 682 CAIDA
AS9304 HGC Global Communications Limited 🇭🇰 HK 6,564 2,054 605 CAIDA
AS4635 HKIX Route Servers 🇭🇰 HK 0 0 29 inferred

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC 🇺🇸 US 52,953 235 14 CAIDA
AS7713 PT Telkom Indonesia Tbk 🇮🇩 ID 45,460 3,576 1 CAIDA
AS9930 TIME dotCom Bhd 🇲🇾 MY 21,646 75 20 CAIDA
AS24482 SG.GS 🇸🇬 SG 5,031 45 30 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS140595 YunJie Communication HK Company Limited 🇭🇰 HK 3 12 71 CAIDA
AS150342 Airstar Bank Limited 🇭🇰 HK 0 3 88 CAIDA
AS18411 EDT Network Services Limited Co,Ltd. 🇹🇼 TW 0 7 67 CAIDA
AS136237 Shuangyu Communication Technology co.,Ltd. 🇨🇳 CN 0 8 56 CAIDA
AS138005 LENOVO (AUSTRALIA & NEW ZEALAND) PTY LIMITED 🇦🇺 AU 0 16 50 CAIDA
AS153862 CloudSecure Consultancy and Services Inc. 🇵🇭 PH 0 3 47 CAIDA

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.