AS55990 Huawei Cloud Service data center 🇨🇳 CN

Huawei. Announcing 429 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes

407

1,744,384 (6,814 × /24)

IPv6 prefixes

3.8 × /32

Upstreams

transit providers observed

Peers

settlement-free adjacencies

Downstreams

transit customers observed

Customer cone

ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number: AS55990
Name: Huawei Cloud Service data center
Organisation: Huawei Cloud(China)
Country: 🇨🇳 CN
RIR: APNIC
Allocated: 2010-12-24
Network type: Content
Traffic levels: 5-10Tbps
Scope: Global
Peering policy: Selective
IRR as-set: AS-HUAWEI
Website: https://www.huaweicloud.com
PeeringDB: net/29425
Exchanges: 5

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

400 valid (93.2%) 2 invalid (0.5%) 27 no ROA (6.3%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network	Country	Cone	IPv4 prefixes	Paths	Source
AS4837 China Unicom Backbone	🇨🇳 CN	20,207	1,520	6	CAIDA
AS9808 China Mobile Backbone	🇨🇳 CN	259	14,198	2,279	CAIDA
AS4808 China Unicom Beijing Province Network	🇨🇳 CN	81	1,536	1,934	CAIDA
AS24400 Shanghai Mobile Communications Co.,Ltd.	🇨🇳 CN	38	545	2	CAIDA
AS23724 China Telecom Beijing IDC Network	🇨🇳 CN	16	877	2,031	CAIDA
AS4811 China Telecom Shanghai IDC Network	🇨🇳 CN	13	1,519	4,492	CAIDA
AS58466 CHINANET Guangdong province network	🇨🇳 CN	9	204	2,125	CAIDA
AS136958 China Unicom Guangdong IDC Network	🇨🇳 CN	8	458	1,071	CAIDA
AS138421 China Unicom	🇨🇳 CN	4	258	1,395	CAIDA
AS131574 Beijing Haiyu Technology Co. Ltd..	🇨🇳 CN	3	2	39	CAIDA
AS139203 Guizhou GuiAn IDC	🇨🇳 CN	2	20	1,096	CAIDA
AS134542 China Unicom IP network	🇨🇳 CN	2	19	500	CAIDA
AS138407 The Internet Data Center of Guizhou Mobile Communication Company Limited	🇨🇳 CN	2	104	1	CAIDA
AS133111 CERNET New Technology Co., Ltd	🇨🇳 CN	0	8	16	inferred

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

No peers observed at the collectors.

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

No downstreams observed at the collectors.

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.