AS56264 Tomato Web (Pvt) Limited 🇧🇩 BD

Announcing 68 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
57
14,592 (57 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
11
1.9 × /32
Upstreams
4
transit providers observed
Peers
0
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
16
transit customers observed
Customer cone
17
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS56264
Name
Tomato Web (Pvt) Limited
Organisation
Tomato Web Limited
Country
🇧🇩 BD
RIR
APNIC
Allocated
2011-05-04
Network type
NSP
Traffic levels
50-100Gbps
Peering policy
Open
IRR as-set
AS56264
Looking glass
https://tomatoweb.com.bd
PeeringDB
net/10811
Exchanges
4
Facilities
5

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

68 valid (100.0%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 0 no ROA (0.0%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS139009 Windstream Communication Limited 🇧🇩 BD 3,395 31 1,305 CAIDA
AS58717 Summit Communications Ltd 🇧🇩 BD 2,518 57 7,324 CAIDA
AS58682 Level3 Carrier Ltd. 🇧🇩 BD 594 19 205 CAIDA
AS137449 SKYNET CHOWMUHANI 🇧🇩 BD 19 6 79 CAIDA

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

No peers observed at the collectors.

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS134135 Uber Technologies 🇧🇩 BD 0 45 2,034 CAIDA
AS153383 Nazim Host 🇧🇩 BD 0 24 1,008 CAIDA
AS141738 noorhost.com.bd 🇧🇩 BD 0 21 947 CAIDA
AS147034 barebox.com.bd 🇧🇩 BD 0 15 630 CAIDA
AS149978 SPNHOST 🇧🇩 BD 0 9 336 CAIDA
AS152689 Hasan Host 🇧🇩 BD 0 7 294 CAIDA
AS133496 Mohi Tech 🇧🇩 BD 0 2 84 CAIDA
AS152708 Jadoo Technology 🇧🇩 BD 0 2 84 CAIDA
AS152898 Innoglobe IT 🇧🇩 BD 0 2 84 CAIDA
AS153304 Raha Technology 🇧🇩 BD 0 2 84 CAIDA
AS138667 Abu Technology 🇧🇩 BD 0 2 84 CAIDA
AS152646 Rakin IT 🇧🇩 BD 0 2 84 CAIDA
AS152674 Marvel Web Host 🇧🇩 BD 0 2 82 CAIDA
AS138032 MOS Hosting Services 🇧🇩 BD 0 1 47 CAIDA
AS150417 Manu Host 🇧🇩 BD 0 1 42 CAIDA
AS152327 Rasu Web Host 🇧🇩 BD 0 1 42 CAIDA

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.