AS57829 IVER 🇳🇴 NO
IVER NORGE AS. Announcing 66 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
60
36,096 (141 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
6
11 × /32
Upstreams
5
transit providers observed
Peers
5
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
3
transit customers observed
Customer cone
4
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS57829
- Name
- IVER
- Organisation
- Iver
- Country
- 🇳🇴 NO
- RIR
- RIPENCC
- Allocated
- 2022-01-18
- Traffic levels
- 20-50Gbps
- Scope
- Europe
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
- RIPE::AS-IVER
- Website
- https://www.iver.com
- PeeringDB
- net/31457
- Exchanges
- 5
- Facilities
- 12
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS3356 Lumen (Level 3) | 🇺🇸 US | 71,998 | 2,073 | 1,028 | CAIDA |
| AS1299 Arelion (fka. Telia Carrier) | 🇸🇪 SE | 69,179 | 108 | 1,551 | CAIDA |
| AS20473 The Constant Company, LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 20,065 | 1,785 | 29 | inferred |
| AS8434 Telenor Sverige AB | 🇸🇪 SE | 50 | 76 | 1 | inferred |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 55,263 | 238 | 493 | CAIDA |
| AS33891 Core-Backbone GmbH | 🇩🇪 DE | 28,479 | 1 | 187 | CAIDA |
| AS24482 SG.GS | 🇸🇬 SG | 20,821 | 45 | 88 | CAIDA |
| AS1257 Tele2 Sverige AB | 🇪🇺 EU | 422 | 388 | 85 | CAIDA |
| AS42708 Glesys AB | 🇸🇪 SE | 97 | 211 | 99 | CAIDA |
| AS29695 Lyse Tele AS | 🇳🇴 NO | 66 | 67 | 12 | CAIDA |
| AS42695 Cleura AB | 🇸🇪 SE | 3 | 44 | 73 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS49409 IVER NORGE AS | 🇳🇴 NO | 0 | 5 | 470 | CAIDA |
| AS49419 Iver Sverige AB | 🇸🇪 SE | 0 | 4 | 269 | CAIDA |
| AS59720 Bofiber AS | 🇳🇴 NO | 0 | 2 | 61 | CAIDA |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.