AS57829 IVER π³π΄ NO
IVER NORGE AS. Announcing 67 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
61
36,352 (142 Γ /24)
IPv6 prefixes
6
11 Γ /32
Upstreams
4
transit providers observed
Peers
5
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
3
transit customers observed
Customer cone
4
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS57829
- Name
- IVER
- Organisation
- Iver
- Country
- π³π΄ NO
- RIR
- RIPENCC
- Allocated
- 2022-01-18
- Traffic levels
- 20-50Gbps
- Scope
- Europe
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
- RIPE::AS-IVER
- Website
- https://www.iver.com
- PeeringDB
- net/31457
- Exchanges
- 5
- Facilities
- 12
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS3356 Lumen (Level 3) | πΊπΈ US | 72,785 | 2,074 | 1,034 | CAIDA |
| AS1299 Arelion (fka. Telia Carrier) | πΈπͺ SE | 70,117 | 109 | 1,308 | CAIDA |
| AS20473 The Constant Company, LLC | πΊπΈ US | 38,277 | 1,780 | 29 | inferred |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | πΊπΈ US | 57,331 | 240 | 598 | CAIDA |
| AS33891 Core-Backbone GmbH | π©πͺ DE | 40,448 | 1 | 184 | CAIDA |
| AS24482 SG.GS | πΈπ¬ SG | 38,403 | 45 | 88 | CAIDA |
| AS1257 Tele2 Sverige AB | πͺπΊ EU | 643 | 386 | 85 | CAIDA |
| AS42708 Glesys AB | πΈπͺ SE | 98 | 203 | 98 | CAIDA |
| AS29695 Lyse Tele AS | π³π΄ NO | 67 | 67 | 12 | CAIDA |
| AS42695 Cleura AB | πΈπͺ SE | 3 | 44 | 73 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS49409 IVER NORGE AS | π³π΄ NO | 0 | 5 | 421 | CAIDA |
| AS49419 Iver Sverige AB | πΈπͺ SE | 0 | 4 | 262 | CAIDA |
| AS59720 Bofiber AS | π³π΄ NO | 0 | 2 | 60 | CAIDA |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.