AS58007 Witine Limited 🇬🇧 GB

Announcing 2 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
1
256 (1 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
1
1 × /48
Upstreams
18
transit providers observed
Peers
0
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
0
transit customers observed
Customer cone
0
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS58007
Name
Witine Limited
Organisation
Witine
Country
🇬🇧 GB
RIR
RIPENCC
Allocated
2022-08-25
Network type
Network Services
Scope
Europe
Peering policy
Open
IRR as-set
RIPE::AS-WITINE
Looking glass
https://lg.witine.com
PeeringDB
net/30827
Exchanges
2
Facilities
2

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

2 valid (100.0%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 0 no ROA (0.0%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS174 Cogent Communications, LLC 🇺🇸 US 65,388 3,987 24 inferred
AS3257 GTT Communications Inc. 🇺🇸 US 62,927 1,814 4 CAIDA
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC 🇺🇸 US 52,866 235 19 inferred
AS9002 RETN Limited 🇬🇧 GB 49,921 19 2 inferred
AS3216 Vimpelcom PJSC 🇷🇺 RU 23,766 590 1 inferred
AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions 🇧🇫 BF 21,476 64 1 inferred
AS34549 meerfarbig GmbH & Co. KG 🇩🇪 DE 15,337 48 6 inferred
AS20562 Open Peering (Broadband Hosting B.V.) 🇳🇱 NL 9,264 0 1 inferred
AS24482 SG.GS 🇸🇬 SG 4,647 45 2 inferred
AS17639 Converge ICT Solutions Inc. 🇵🇭 PH 273 567 2 inferred
AS29075 IELO-LIAZO SERVICES SAS 🇫🇷 FR 201 23 2 inferred
AS25091 IP-Max SA 🇨🇭 CH 171 25 1 inferred
AS12779 IT.Gate S.p.A. 🇮🇹 IT 76 25 1 inferred
AS50304 Blix Solutions AS 🇳🇴 NO 34 103 2 inferred
AS48362 Stadtwerke Feldkirch 🇦🇹 AT 15 8 2 inferred
AS48185 team.blue NV 🇧🇪 BE 14 1 2 inferred
AS50300 CustodianDC Limited 🇬🇧 GB 9 39 2 inferred
AS213241 TECHIT.BE SRL 🇧🇪 BE 0 14 1 inferred

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

No peers observed at the collectors.

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

No downstreams observed at the collectors.

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.