AS58321 Oxylion Sp. z o.o. π΅π± PL
Announcing 23 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
22
33,792 (132 Γ /24)
IPv6 prefixes
1
8 Γ /32
Upstreams
5
transit providers observed
Peers
3
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
5
transit customers observed
Customer cone
15
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS58321
- Name
- Oxylion Sp. z o.o.
- Organisation
- Oxylion
- Country
- π΅π± PL
- RIR
- RIPENCC
- Allocated
- 2012-06-25
- Network type
- NSP
- Traffic levels
- 20-50Gbps
- Scope
- Regional
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
- AS-OXYLION
- PeeringDB
- net/7870
- Exchanges
- 4
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS1299 Arelion (fka. Telia Carrier) | πΈπͺ SE | 69,870 | 130 | 496 | CAIDA |
| AS3257 GTT Communications Inc. | πΊπΈ US | 63,553 | 1,885 | 364 | CAIDA |
| AS20473 The Constant Company, LLC | πΊπΈ US | 19,852 | 1,858 | 1 | inferred |
| AS12741 Netia SA | π΅π± PL | 645 | 165 | 1,392 | CAIDA |
| AS24115 Equinix IX | πΈπ¬ SG | 0 | 0 | 3 | inferred |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | πΊπΈ US | 56,835 | 236 | 268 | CAIDA |
| AS33891 Core-Backbone GmbH | π©πͺ DE | 28,560 | 1 | 13 | CAIDA |
| AS24482 SG.GS | πΈπ¬ SG | 20,611 | 45 | 55 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS29205 VERCOM S.A. | π΅π± PL | 10 | 18 | 262 | CAIDA |
| AS29522 Cyber_Folks S.A. | π΅π± PL | 0 | 29 | 1,180 | CAIDA |
| AS41079 Cyber_Folks S.A. | π΅π± PL | 0 | 24 | 416 | CAIDA |
| AS34360 Cyber_Folks S.A. | π΅π± PL | 0 | 2 | 87 | CAIDA |
| AS48760 Cyber_Folks S.A. | π΅π± PL | 0 | 1 | 21 | CAIDA |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.