AS58779 i4HK Limited πŸ‡­πŸ‡° HK

Announcing 30 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
29
9,472 (37 Γ— /24)
IPv6 prefixes
1
1 Γ— /32
Upstreams
6
transit providers observed
Peers
5
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
6
transit customers observed
Customer cone
7
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS58779
Name
i4HK Limited
Organisation
i4HK Limited
Country
πŸ‡­πŸ‡° HK
RIR
APNIC
Allocated
2012-12-18
Network type
NSP
Traffic levels
5-10Gbps
Scope
Regional
Peering policy
Open
IRR as-set
AS-I4HK
PeeringDB
net/5807
Exchanges
1

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

14 valid (46.7%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 16 no ROA (53.3%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS3491 PCCW Global (HK) Ltd. πŸ‡­πŸ‡° HK 50,474 532 158 CAIDA
AS23764 China Telecom Global πŸ‡­πŸ‡° HK 42,966 184 66 CAIDA
AS58453 China Mobile International πŸ‡­πŸ‡° HK 23,023 76 1 inferred
AS9304 HGC Global Communications Limited πŸ‡­πŸ‡° HK 6,251 2,027 1,619 CAIDA
AS4058 CITIC Telecom International CPC Limited πŸ‡­πŸ‡° HK 16 206 154 CAIDA
AS4635 HKIX Route Servers πŸ‡­πŸ‡° HK 0 0 236 inferred

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 52,966 235 36 CAIDA
AS9930 TIME dotCom Bhd πŸ‡²πŸ‡Ύ MY 21,398 75 46 CAIDA
AS8359 MTS PJSC πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί RU 5,651 441 46 CAIDA
AS24482 SG.GS πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬ SG 4,727 45 53 CAIDA
AS55720 Gigabit Hosting Sdn Bhd πŸ‡²πŸ‡Ύ MY 143 278 52 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS64047 Viking Telecom Limited πŸ‡­πŸ‡° HK 0 36 1,067 CAIDA
AS132056 SCICUBE LIMITED πŸ‡­πŸ‡° HK 0 10 229 CAIDA
AS56082 INTERNET-SOLUTION-HK πŸ‡­πŸ‡° HK 0 5 180 CAIDA
AS133027 i4HK Limited πŸ‡­πŸ‡° HK 0 2 80 CAIDA
AS63849 Easy Tone Network Limited πŸ‡­πŸ‡° HK 0 2 53 CAIDA
AS152848 asdf.hk πŸ‡­πŸ‡° HK 0 2 42 CAIDA

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.