AS59378 ADN International Gateway Limited π§π© BD
Announcing 6 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
5
2,048 (8 Γ /24)
IPv6 prefixes
1
1 Γ /48
Upstreams
4
transit providers observed
Peers
5
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
1
transit customers observed
Customer cone
27
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS59378
- Name
- ADN International Gateway Limited
- Organisation
- ADN International Gateway
- Country
- π§π© BD
- RIR
- APNIC
- Allocated
- 2014-06-25
- Network type
- Network Services
- Scope
- Not Disclosed
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
- AS-AIG-BD
- Website
- https://adngateway.net/
- PeeringDB
- net/29065
- Exchanges
- 1
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS5511 Orange S.A. | π«π· FR | 51,485 | 728 | 173 | CAIDA |
| AS7473 Singapore Telecommunications Ltd | πΈπ¬ SG | 46,047 | 46 | 381 | CAIDA |
| AS58453 China Mobile International | ππ° HK | 22,953 | 76 | 185 | CAIDA |
| AS132132 MyRepublic Ltd. | πΈπ¬ SG | 172 | 7 | 15 | inferred |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | πΊπΈ US | 53,277 | 236 | 165 | CAIDA |
| AS24482 SG.GS | πΈπ¬ SG | 4,773 | 45 | 25 | CAIDA |
| AS132884 Summit Communications Limited | π§π© BD | 1,693 | 3 | 1,307 | CAIDA |
| AS17639 Converge ICT Solutions Inc. | π΅π PH | 274 | 567 | 25 | CAIDA |
| AS38001 NewMedia Express Pte. Ltd. | πΈπ¬ SG | 27 | 68 | 25 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS38203 ADN Telecom Ltd. | π§π© BD | 26 | 67 | 2,059 | CAIDA |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.