AS59497 Buknet LLC πΊπ¦ UA
Announcing 32 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
31
13,056 (51 Γ /24)
IPv6 prefixes
1
8 Γ /32
Upstreams
7
transit providers observed
Peers
1
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
5
transit customers observed
Customer cone
10
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS59497
- Name
- Buknet LLC
- Organisation
- Buknet
- Country
- πΊπ¦ UA
- RIR
- RIPENCC
- Allocated
- 2012-07-25
- Network type
- Cable/DSL/ISP
- Scope
- Regional
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
- AS-BUKNET
- Website
- https://intelekt.net
- PeeringDB
- net/6080
- Exchanges
- 5
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS9002 RETN Limited | π¬π§ GB | 53,465 | 18 | 210 | CAIDA |
| AS50263 A-Systems Sp. z o.o. | π΅π± PL | 21,088 | 1 | 145 | CAIDA |
| AS3255 Ukrainian Academic and Research Network | πΊπ¦ UA | 555 | 279 | 2 | CAIDA |
| AS35297 Dataline LLC | πΊπ¦ UA | 534 | 18 | 1,438 | CAIDA |
| AS3326 Datagroup PJSC | πΊπ¦ UA | 534 | 85 | 100 | CAIDA |
| AS199995 Omega Telecom LLC | πΊπ¦ UA | 260 | 18 | 273 | CAIDA |
| AS15895 "Kyivstar" PJSC | πΊπ¦ UA | 178 | 45 | 25 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS24482 SG.GS | πΈπ¬ SG | 20,600 | 45 | 46 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS39399 Private Enterprise Firma Fenix VT | πΊπ¦ UA | 5 | 5 | 404 | CAIDA |
| AS50161 LLC "VELES ISP" | πΊπ¦ UA | 0 | 2 | 98 | CAIDA |
| AS50005 MTKNET LLC | πΊπ¦ UA | 0 | 2 | 98 | CAIDA |
| AS51253 PP Potapov Nikolay Vasilievich | πΊπ¦ UA | 0 | 1 | 49 | CAIDA |
| AS197218 PP Dmutrashko Evgeny Vitalievich | πΊπ¦ UA | 0 | 3 | 3 | CAIDA |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.