AS59790 Marco Bungalski GmbH 🇩🇪 DE
Announcing 35 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
32
29,184 (114 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
3
24 × /32
Upstreams
4
transit providers observed
Peers
5
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
3
transit customers observed
Customer cone
7
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS59790
- Name
- Marco Bungalski GmbH
- Organisation
- Marco Bungalski
- Country
- 🇩🇪 DE
- RIR
- RIPENCC
- Allocated
- 2016-06-29
- Network type
- Cable/DSL/ISP
- Scope
- Regional
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
- AS-BUNGALSKI
- Website
- https://www.t-m-net.de
- PeeringDB
- net/24901
- Exchanges
- 6
- Facilities
- 8
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS50263 A-Systems Sp. z o.o. | 🇵🇱 PL | 1,398 | 1 | 6 | CAIDA |
| AS50629 LWLcom GmbH | 🇩🇪 DE | 405 | 24 | 776 | CAIDA |
| AS212508 Lowhosting services of Davide Gennari | 🇮🇹 IT | 156 | 6 | 35 | CAIDA |
| AS25394 MK Netzdienste Verwaltungs GmbH trading as MK Netzdienste GmbH & Co. KG | 🇩🇪 DE | 43 | 27 | 461 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 53,090 | 185 | 224 | CAIDA |
| AS24482 SG.GS | 🇸🇬 SG | 4,796 | 45 | 38 | CAIDA |
| AS57821 Nonattached Network e.V. | 🇩🇪 DE | 0 | 1 | 38 | CAIDA |
| AS34800 Securebit AG | 🇨🇠CH | 0 | 1 | 35 | CAIDA |
| AS202365 Chronos | 🇹🇷 TR | 0 | 4 | 35 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS41110 DSLmobil GmbH | 🇩🇪 DE | 4 | 31 | 44 | CAIDA |
| AS49836 Median Telecom GmbH | 🇩🇪 DE | 0 | 1 | 44 | CAIDA |
| AS35061 "RZV" - RECHENZENTRUM VERDEN GMBH | 🇩🇪 DE | 0 | 1 | 41 | CAIDA |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.