AS59890 Kabel-TV Lampert GmbH & Co KG 🇦🇹 AT
Announcing 9 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
5
13,312 (52 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
4
11 × /32
Upstreams
5
transit providers observed
Peers
5
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
1
transit customers observed
Customer cone
4
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS59890
- Name
- Kabel-TV Lampert GmbH & Co KG
- Organisation
- Kabel-TV Lampert
- Country
- 🇦🇹 AT
- RIR
- RIPENCC
- Allocated
- 2014-08-20
- Network type
- Cable/DSL/ISP
- Scope
- Regional
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
- RIPE::AS-LAMPERT
- Website
- https://www.lampert.at
- PeeringDB
- net/13592
- Exchanges
- 4
- Facilities
- 2
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS3356 Lumen (Level 3) | 🇺🇸 US | 70,617 | 2,074 | 11 | CAIDA |
| AS174 Cogent Communications, LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 65,441 | 4,018 | 41 | CAIDA |
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 52,822 | 235 | 311 | CAIDA |
| AS9002 RETN Limited | 🇬🇧 GB | 49,870 | 19 | 4 | inferred |
| AS60068 Datacamp Limited (CDN77 / DataPacket) | 🇬🇧 GB | 15,474 | 420 | 50 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS24482 SG.GS | 🇸🇬 SG | 4,720 | 45 | 9 | CAIDA |
| AS1836 green.ch AG | 🇨🇠CH | 43 | 78 | 9 | CAIDA |
| AS34019 Hivane Association | 🇫🇷 FR | 38 | 6 | 3 | CAIDA |
| AS29504 Freenet Liberec, z.s. | 🇨🇿 CZ | 0 | 1 | 10 | CAIDA |
| AS49432 Dominic Schallert trading as schallert.com e.U. | 🇦🇹 AT | 0 | 1 | 9 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS35223 Hoi Internet AG | 🇱🇮 LI | 3 | 2 | 88 | CAIDA |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.