AS60119 Ediniy Operator Svyazi LLC πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί RU

Announcing 16 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
16
6,144 (24 Γ— /24)
IPv6 prefixes
0
-
Upstreams
6
transit providers observed
Peers
7
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
1
transit customers observed
Customer cone
2
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS60119
Name
Ediniy Operator Svyazi LLC
Organisation
Novosibirsk Telecommunication Company
Country
πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί RU
RIR
RIPENCC
Allocated
2014-05-12
Network type
Cable/DSL/ISP
Traffic levels
50-100Gbps
Scope
Regional
Peering policy
No
IRR as-set
AS-EDINOS
Looking glass
https://lg.edinos.ru/
PeeringDB
net/21468
Exchanges
5

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

16 valid (100.0%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 0 no ROA (0.0%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS20485 TransTeleCom JSC πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί RU 28,351 85 33 CAIDA
AS12389 Rostelecom PJSC πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί RU 26,770 3,269 199 inferred
AS9049 JSC "ER-Telecom Holding" πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί RU 25,000 40 56 CAIDA
AS3216 Vimpelcom PJSC πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί RU 24,779 590 73 CAIDA
AS31200 Novotelecom Ltd πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί RU 44 58 192 CAIDA
AS34757 Sibirskie Seti Ltd. πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί RU 9 11 115 CAIDA

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions πŸ‡§πŸ‡« BF 21,727 64 7 CAIDA
AS8447 A1 Telekom Austria AG πŸ‡¦πŸ‡Ή AT 20,369 121 6 CAIDA
AS50673 Serverius Holding B.V. πŸ‡³πŸ‡± NL 16,148 130 14 CAIDA
AS24482 SG.GS πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬ SG 5,034 45 7 CAIDA
AS208972 GIBIRNet Iletisim πŸ‡ΉπŸ‡· TR 419 89 7 CAIDA
AS8218 Zayo Europe πŸ‡«πŸ‡· FR 341 19 2 CAIDA
AS49673 Truenetwork LLC πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί RU 9 4 22 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS208087 Ediniy Operator Svyazi LLC πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί RU 0 9 6 CAIDA

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.