AS60187 London Grid for Learning Trust 🇬🇧 GB

Announcing 49 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
47
81,664 (319 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
2
12 × /32
Upstreams
1
transit providers observed
Peers
11
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
3
transit customers observed
Customer cone
4
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS60187
Name
London Grid for Learning Trust
Organisation
London Grid for Learning Trust
Country
🇬🇧 GB
RIR
RIPENCC
Allocated
2013-09-09
Network type
Educational/Research
Traffic levels
100-200Gbps
Scope
Regional
Peering policy
Selective
IRR as-set
RIPE::AS-LGFLPLUS
PeeringDB
net/21230
Exchanges
1
Facilities
2

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

30 valid (61.2%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 19 no ROA (38.8%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS786 Jisc Services Limited 🇬🇧 GB 41 213 1,978 CAIDA

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC 🇺🇸 US 53,605 236 78 CAIDA
AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions 🇧🇫 BF 21,292 64 13 CAIDA
AS31500 Global Network Management Inc 🇦🇬 AG 20,835 40 13 CAIDA
AS34549 meerfarbig GmbH & Co. KG 🇩🇪 DE 15,114 48 52 CAIDA
AS24482 SG.GS 🇸🇬 SG 4,610 45 13 CAIDA
AS29075 IELO-LIAZO SERVICES SAS 🇫🇷 FR 200 23 13 CAIDA
AS12779 IT.Gate S.p.A. 🇮🇹 IT 76 25 13 CAIDA
AS50304 Blix Solutions AS 🇳🇴 NO 34 97 26 CAIDA
AS48362 Stadtwerke Feldkirch 🇦🇹 AT 15 8 13 CAIDA
AS48185 team.blue NV 🇧🇪 BE 14 1 13 CAIDA
AS50300 CustodianDC Limited 🇬🇧 GB 9 39 13 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS211775 London Grid for Learning Trust 🇬🇧 GB 0 3 124 CAIDA
AS56929 WANDSWORTH-BOROUGH-COUNCIL 🇬🇧 GB 0 1 41 CAIDA
AS57377 LONDON BOROUGH OF MERTON 🇬🇧 GB 0 1 41 CAIDA

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.