AS60798 Servereasy Srl 🇮🇹 IT

Announcing 34 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
28
11,008 (43 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
6
261 × /48
Upstreams
4
transit providers observed
Peers
5
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
10
transit customers observed
Customer cone
110
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS60798
Name
Servereasy Srl
Organisation
Servereasy Srl
Country
🇮🇹 IT
RIR
RIPENCC
Allocated
2013-05-10
Network type
Content
Traffic levels
20-50Gbps
Scope
Regional
Peering policy
Open
IRR as-set
AS-SERVEREASY1
PeeringDB
net/10846
Exchanges
2
Facilities
3

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

31 valid (91.2%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 3 no ROA (8.8%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS3257 GTT Communications Inc. 🇺🇸 US 65,651 1,909 1,333 CAIDA
AS2914 NTT America, Inc. 🇺🇸 US 59,142 1,721 718 CAIDA
AS6762 Telecom Italia Sparkle (Seabone) 🇮🇹 IT 55,835 307 846 CAIDA
AS29632 Netassist International EOOD 🇧🇬 BG 53 0 9 inferred

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC 🇺🇸 US 57,046 241 494 CAIDA
AS24482 SG.GS 🇸🇬 SG 24,049 45 73 CAIDA
AS8218 Zayo Europe 🇫🇷 FR 356 19 72 CAIDA
AS31543 myNet GmbH 🇦🇹 AT 13 25 72 CAIDA
AS59919 Brainbox S.r.l. 🇮🇹 IT 2 8 65 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS12779 IT.Gate S.p.A. 🇮🇹 IT 75 25 139 CAIDA
AS41720 Revolution Provider S.r.l. 🇮🇹 IT 24 15 433 CAIDA
AS202709 NetoIP.com srl 🇮🇹 IT 4 19 650 CAIDA
AS215540 GLOBAL CONNECTIVITY SOLUTIONS LLP 🇬🇧 GB 3 237 235 CAIDA
AS207713 GLOBAL INTERNET SOLUTIONS LLC 🇷🇺 RU 2 37 492 CAIDA
AS203073 G.T. SRL 🇮🇹 IT 0 4 199 CAIDA
AS207905 Uania srl 🇮🇹 IT 0 3 96 CAIDA
AS218854 Sefthy S.r.l. 🇮🇹 IT 0 1 42 CAIDA
AS219359 Edge Core FZE 🇦🇪 AE 0 16 42 CAIDA
AS203391 Cloud DNS Ltd 🇧🇬 BG 0 8 6 CAIDA

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.