AS61029 DODW Holding B.V. 🇳🇱 NL
Announcing 16 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
13
3,328 (13 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
3
9 × /32
Upstreams
7
transit providers observed
Peers
7
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
0
transit customers observed
Customer cone
0
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS61029
- Name
- DODW Holding B.V.
- Organisation
- Bitency B.V.
- Country
- 🇳🇱 NL
- RIR
- RIPENCC
- Allocated
- 2013-03-11
- Network type
- Content
- Traffic levels
- 5-10Gbps
- Scope
- Europe
- Peering policy
- Selective
- IRR as-set
- RIPE::AS-BITENCY
- Website
- https://bitency.nl
- PeeringDB
- net/5292
- Exchanges
- 2
- Facilities
- 6
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS3257 GTT Communications Inc. | 🇺🇸 US | 63,630 | 1,882 | 169 | CAIDA |
| AS2914 NTT America, Inc. | 🇺🇸 US | 58,555 | 1,652 | 196 | CAIDA |
| AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions | 🇧🇫 BF | 26,115 | 64 | 14 | inferred |
| AS137409 GSL Networks Pty LTD | 🇦🇺 AU | 20,012 | 574 | 44 | inferred |
| AS1103 SURF B.V. | 🇳🇱 NL | 29 | 99 | 11 | inferred |
| AS20766 Association "Gitoyen" | 🇫🇷 FR | 18 | 6 | 11 | inferred |
| AS56662 Marcin Gondek | 🇵🇱 PL | 0 | 0 | 3 | inferred |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 56,860 | 236 | 94 | CAIDA |
| AS31500 Global Network Management Inc | 🇦🇬 AG | 20,982 | 40 | 11 | CAIDA |
| AS24482 SG.GS | 🇸🇬 SG | 20,772 | 45 | 14 | CAIDA |
| AS34927 iFog GmbH | 🇨🇭 CH | 20,096 | 40 | 11 | CAIDA |
| AS34019 Hivane Association | 🇫🇷 FR | 39 | 6 | 3 | CAIDA |
| AS58057 Securebit AG | 🇨🇭 CH | 20 | 14 | 14 | CAIDA |
| AS202365 Chronos | 🇹🇷 TR | 0 | 4 | 11 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
No downstreams observed at the collectors.
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.