AS61621 Norte.Net Telecomunicações Ltda 🇧🇷 BR
Norte.Net Telecomunicações Ltda. Announcing 36 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
20
9,216 (36 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
16
3.8 × /32
Upstreams
5
transit providers observed
Peers
4
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
50
transit customers observed
Customer cone
180
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS61621
- Name
- Norte.Net Telecomunicações Ltda
- Organisation
- Norte.Net Telecomunicações
- Country
- 🇧🇷 BR
- RIR
- LACNIC
- Allocated
- 2024-08-26
- Network type
- NSP
- Traffic levels
- 500-1000Gbps
- Scope
- South America
- Peering policy
- Restrictive
- IRR as-set
- AS-NORTE-NET-CONE
- Website
- http://nortenettelecom.net
- Looking glass
- http://lg.nortenettelecom.com.br
- PeeringDB
- net/37850
- Exchanges
- 3
- Facilities
- 7
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS3356 Lumen (Level 3) | 🇺🇸 US | 71,403 | 2,088 | 7,864 | CAIDA |
| AS10429 Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) | 🇧🇷 BR | 22,302 | 89 | 13 | CAIDA |
| AS26615 TIM S/A | 🇧🇷 BR | 21,490 | 1,044 | 159 | inferred |
| AS270735 COMPUTIZE NETWORK TELECOMUNICACOES LTDA | 🇧🇷 BR | 664 | 2 | 169 | CAIDA |
| AS264953 INTEGRATO TELECOMUNICAÇÕES LTDA - ME | 🇧🇷 BR | 3 | 7 | 640 | inferred |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 54,955 | 185 | 3,515 | CAIDA |
| AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions | 🇧🇫 BF | 23,884 | 64 | 142 | CAIDA |
| AS24482 SG.GS | 🇸🇬 SG | 4,871 | 45 | 273 | CAIDA |
| AS269420 IST INFORMATICA E TELECOMUNICACAO LTDA | 🇧🇷 BR | 3 | 1 | 34 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.