AS61696 DOMUS TELECOM LTDA πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR

Announcing 25 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
14
6,144 (24 Γ— /24)
IPv6 prefixes
11
3 Γ— /32
Upstreams
4
transit providers observed
Peers
3
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
11
transit customers observed
Customer cone
13
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS61696
Name
DOMUS TELECOM LTDA
Organisation
DOMUS TELECOM
Country
πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR
RIR
LACNIC
Allocated
2014-07-17
Network type
Cable/DSL/ISP
Traffic levels
50-100Gbps
Scope
Regional
Peering policy
Open
IRR as-set
AS61696:AS-ALL
PeeringDB
net/24804
Exchanges
4
Facilities
1

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

25 valid (100.0%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 0 no ROA (0.0%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS16735 Algar Telecom πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 30,742 46 481 CAIDA
AS53062 ACESSOLINE TELECOMUNICACOES LTDA πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 1,662 94 591 CAIDA
AS53065 Opcao Telecom πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 50 54 153 CAIDA

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 56,746 237 930 CAIDA
AS35280 F5 Networks SARL πŸ‡«πŸ‡· FR 34,721 60 106 CAIDA
AS24482 SG.GS πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬ SG 23,796 45 115 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS263509 DOMUS TELECOM πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 3 31 727 CAIDA
AS262722 Televigo Telecom EIRELI πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 2 14 190 CAIDA
AS265018 DOMUS TELECOM πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 0 12 246 CAIDA
AS263322 Vipnet πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 0 14 211 CAIDA
AS61910 Double Net πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 0 7 179 CAIDA
AS28592 DOMUS TELECOM LTDA πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 0 7 93 CAIDA
AS271510 D. L. SPOHR & CIA LTDA πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 0 7 93 CAIDA
AS267226 Wagner Rafael Eckert πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 0 7 85 CAIDA
AS262824 Net System Telecom πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 0 10 74 CAIDA
AS266156 SERVICOS DE COMUNICACAO LTDA πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 0 4 50 CAIDA
AS268108 UP INTERNET TELECOMUNICAÇÕES LTDA πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 0 7 18 CAIDA

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.