AS61805 Emex Internet 🇧🇷 BR
Announcing 24 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
21
10,752 (42 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
3
2 × /32
Upstreams
6
transit providers observed
Peers
5
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
0
transit customers observed
Customer cone
0
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS61805
- Name
- Emex Internet
- Organisation
- EMEX INTERNET
- Country
- 🇧🇷 BR
- RIR
- LACNIC
- Allocated
- 2014-06-25
- Network type
- Cable/DSL/ISP
- Traffic levels
- 50-100Gbps
- Scope
- Europe
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
- AS-EMEX
- Website
- https://www.emexinternet.com.br
- Looking glass
- http://lg.emexinternet.com.br
- PeeringDB
- net/9967
- Exchanges
- 3
- Facilities
- 5
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS2914 NTT America, Inc. | 🇺🇸 US | 56,290 | 1,573 | 38 | CAIDA |
| AS7195 EdgeUno | 🇨🇴 CO | 35,379 | 129 | 82 | CAIDA |
| AS39686 Eurofiber Nederland BV | 🇳🇱 NL | 30,209 | 76 | 2 | CAIDA |
| AS40850 UPIX NETWORKS INTERNATIONAL LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 4,245 | 11 | 42 | CAIDA |
| AS28198 SEMPRE TELECOMUNICACOES LTDA | 🇧🇷 BR | 203 | 223 | 18 | CAIDA |
| AS213241 TECHIT.BE SRL | 🇧🇪 BE | 0 | 14 | 2 | inferred |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 53,055 | 235 | 223 | CAIDA |
| AS35280 F5 Networks SARL | 🇫🇷 FR | 22,029 | 59 | 16 | CAIDA |
| AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions | 🇧🇫 BF | 21,776 | 64 | 21 | CAIDA |
| AS24482 SG.GS | 🇸🇬 SG | 5,028 | 45 | 24 | CAIDA |
| AS1103 SURF B.V. | 🇳🇱 NL | 30 | 99 | 23 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
No downstreams observed at the collectors.
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.