AS62068 SpectraIP B.V. 🇳🇱 NL
Announcing 32 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
24
6,400 (25 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
8
35 × /32
Upstreams
8
transit providers observed
Peers
0
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
5
transit customers observed
Customer cone
3
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS62068
- Name
- SpectraIP B.V.
- Organisation
- SpectraIP B.V. NL
- Country
- 🇳🇱 NL
- RIR
- RIPENCC
- Allocated
- 2016-05-03
- Network type
- Cable/DSL/ISP
- Traffic levels
- 50-100Gbps
- Scope
- Europe
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
- AS-SPECTRAIP
- Website
- https://spectraip.net
- Looking glass
- https://lg.spectraip.net
- PeeringDB
- net/10588
- Exchanges
- 3
- Facilities
- 3
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS174 Cogent Communications, LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 65,907 | 3,881 | 907 | CAIDA |
| AS3257 GTT Communications Inc. | 🇺🇸 US | 62,304 | 1,910 | 351 | CAIDA |
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 54,635 | 240 | 282 | inferred |
| AS24482 SG.GS | 🇸🇬 SG | 20,181 | 45 | 10 | inferred |
| AS57717 FiberXpress BV | 🇳🇱 NL | 37 | 9 | 44 | CAIDA |
| AS1103 SURF B.V. | 🇳🇱 NL | 28 | 99 | 10 | inferred |
| AS58057 Securebit AG | 🇨🇭 CH | 20 | 13 | 10 | inferred |
| AS56662 Marcin Gondek | 🇵🇱 PL | 0 | 0 | 10 | inferred |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
No peers observed at the collectors.
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS218878 SpectraIP B.V. | 🇳🇱 NL | 2 | 11 | 1 | inferred |
| AS214337 Webmedia - Nijmegen B.V. | 🇳🇱 NL | 0 | 4 | 200 | CAIDA |
| AS50868 VoIPStarr B.V. | 🇳🇱 NL | 0 | 2 | 117 | CAIDA |
| AS212025 Cukman Kresimir | 🇭🇷 HR | 0 | 2 | 33 | inferred |
| AS209553 NETVAZ LIMITED | 🇬🇧 GB | 0 | 4 | 15 | inferred |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.