AS6220 inContact Inc. 🇺🇸 US

Announcing 89 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
89
33,792 (132 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
0
-
Upstreams
17
transit providers observed
Peers
0
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
0
transit customers observed
Customer cone
0
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS6220
Name
inContact Inc.
Organisation
inContact
Country
🇺🇸 US
RIR
ARIN
Scope
Not Disclosed
Peering policy
Open
PeeringDB
net/28691

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

14 valid (15.7%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 75 no ROA (84.3%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS3356 Lumen (Level 3) 🇺🇸 US 70,662 2,068 1,602 CAIDA
AS174 Cogent Communications, LLC 🇺🇸 US 65,732 4,017 1,093 CAIDA
AS3257 GTT Communications Inc. 🇺🇸 US 63,149 1,812 32 CAIDA
AS6453 TATA Communications (America) Inc 🇺🇸 US 56,042 124 1 CAIDA
AS701 Verizon Business 🇺🇸 US 55,932 957 173 CAIDA
AS2914 NTT America, Inc. 🇺🇸 US 55,116 1,616 198 CAIDA
AS4826 Vocus Connect International Backbone 🇦🇺 AU 44,886 160 88 CAIDA
AS4637 Telstra International Limited 🇭🇰 HK 36,776 666 42 CAIDA
AS4755 TATA Communications (formerly VSNL) 🇮🇳 IN 23,369 2,353 86 CAIDA
AS30844 Liquid Intelligent Technologies 🇬🇧 GB 21,713 290 37 CAIDA
AS3741 Dimension Data 🇿🇦 ZA 21,642 494 133 CAIDA
AS22381 SAMM (Megatelecom) 🇧🇷 BR 21,243 102 8 CAIDA
AS703 Verizon Business - APAC 🇺🇸 US 19,833 45 33 CAIDA
AS15830 Equinix, Inc. 🇳🇱 NL 18,311 1,082 73 CAIDA
AS702 Verizon Business - EMEA 🇺🇸 US 8,233 442 42 CAIDA
AS5384 EMIRATES TELECOMMUNICATIONS GROUP COMPANY (ETISALAT GROUP) PJSC 🇦🇪 AE 33 2,390 2 CAIDA
AS3300 British Telecommunications Limited 🇬🇧 GB 21 123 26 CAIDA

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

No peers observed at the collectors.

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

No downstreams observed at the collectors.

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.