AS62205 Unitel, LLC πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί RU

Announcing 20 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
19
9,728 (38 Γ— /24)
IPv6 prefixes
1
1 Γ— /32
Upstreams
6
transit providers observed
Peers
7
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
4
transit customers observed
Customer cone
5
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS62205
Name
Unitel, LLC
Organisation
Unitel, LLC
Country
πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί RU
RIR
RIPENCC
Allocated
2013-12-27
Network type
Cable/DSL/ISP
Scope
Regional
Peering policy
Selective
IRR as-set
RIPE::AS-UNITELECOM-NET
PeeringDB
net/34717
Exchanges
6
Facilities
6

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

19 valid (95.0%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 1 no ROA (5.0%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS9002 RETN Limited πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ GB 53,562 18 177 CAIDA
AS20485 TransTeleCom JSC πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί RU 28,416 85 227 CAIDA
AS57304 RETN Russia πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί RU 24,644 6 8 CAIDA
AS31133 MegaFon PJSC πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί RU 24,023 493 52 CAIDA
AS20764 CJSC RASCOM πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί RU 23,651 8 124 CAIDA
AS31500 Global Network Management Inc πŸ‡¦πŸ‡¬ AG 20,882 40 192 CAIDA

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 56,835 236 96 CAIDA
AS33891 Core-Backbone GmbH πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ DE 28,560 1 21 CAIDA
AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions πŸ‡§πŸ‡« BF 26,575 64 22 CAIDA
AS24482 SG.GS πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬ SG 20,611 45 21 CAIDA
AS56655 Gigahost AS πŸ‡³πŸ‡΄ NO 19,952 34 22 CAIDA
AS208972 GIBIRNet Iletisim πŸ‡ΉπŸ‡· TR 475 89 22 CAIDA
AS49673 Truenetwork LLC πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί RU 9 4 21 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS202650 Sarkisov Yury Leonidovich πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί RU 0 2 43 CAIDA
AS47168 LLC "Lenvendo-Soft" πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί RU 0 5 39 CAIDA
AS202795 "Trans-Missia" LLC πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί RU 0 1 26 CAIDA
AS200215 Fabrika-Kukhnya Ltd. πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί RU 0 1 26 CAIDA

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.